Literature DB >> 20644205

Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics.

Anna Trtchounian1, Monique Williams, Prue Talbot.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes are marketed as tobacco-free nicotine delivery devices that have received little laboratory evaluation. In this study, the smoking properties of conventional and e-cigarettes were compared by examining the vacuum required to produce smoke (conventional cigarettes) or aerosol (e-cigarettes) and the density of the smoke/aerosol over time.
METHODS: Vacuum was measured using a manometer coupled to a smoking machine. The density of aerosol or smoke was measured spectrophotometrically. E-cigarettes were subjected to smoke-out experiments in which vacuum and aerosol density were measured until each cartridge was exhausted.
RESULTS: The vacuum required to smoke conventional cigarettes varied among the eight brands tested. Lights and ultra-light brands required stronger vacuums to smoke than unfiltered and regular filtered brands. Except for one brand, higher vacuums were required to smoke e-cigarettes than conventional brands. Smoke/aerosol density was stable for conventional brands and for e-cigarettes over the first 10 puffs; however, aerosol density of e-cigarettes dropped during subsequent smoking, and higher vacuums were required to produce aerosol as the puff number increased. While conventional cigarettes were uniform in their smoking behavior within brands, vacuum and density varied within brands of e-cigarettes. DISCUSSION: Generally, e-cigarettes required stronger vacuums (suction) to smoke than conventional brands, and the effects of this on human health could be adverse. The amount of aerosol produced by e-cigarettes decreased during smoking, which necessitated increasing puff strength to produce aerosol. The decreased efficiency of aerosol production during e-cigarette smoking makes dosing nonuniform over time and calls into question their usefulness as nicotine delivery devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20644205     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  68 in total

1.  E-Cigarette Use and Intention to Initiate or Quit Smoking Among US Youths.

Authors:  Ji-Yeun Park; Dong-Chul Seo; Hsien-Chang Lin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Electronic cigarettes: effective nicotine delivery after acute administration.

Authors:  Andrea Rae Vansickel; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Distribution, quantification and toxicity of cinnamaldehyde in electronic cigarette refill fluids and aerosols.

Authors:  Rachel Z Behar; Wentai Luo; Sabrina C Lin; Yuhuan Wang; Jackelyn Valle; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Determination of Nicotine Content and Delivery in Disposable Electronic Cigarettes Available in the United States by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Todd Pagano; A Gary DiFrancesco; Susan B Smith; Jerrin George; Gloria Wink; Irfan Rahman; Risa J Robinson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda.

Authors:  Jean-François Etter; Chris Bullen; Andreas D Flouris; Murray Laugesen; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Chronic intermittent electronic cigarette exposure induces cardiac dysfunction and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein-E knockout mice.

Authors:  Jorge Espinoza-Derout; Kamrul M Hasan; Xuesi M Shao; Maria C Jordan; Carl Sims; Desean L Lee; Satyesh Sinha; Zena Simmons; Norma Mtume; Yanjun Liu; Kenneth P Roos; Amiya P Sinha-Hikim; Theodore C Friedman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Whole body electronic cigarette exposure system for efficient evaluation of diverse inhalation conditions and products.

Authors:  Jay L Zweier; Mahmoud T Shalaan; Alexandre Samouilov; Ibrahim G Saleh; Mohamed A El-Mahdy
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Electronic cigarette chemicals transfer from a vape shop to a nearby business in a multiple-tenant retail building.

Authors:  Careen Khachatoorian; Peyton Jacob Iii; Neal L Benowitz; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Automated 3-D Printed Arrays to Evaluate Genotoxic Chemistry: E-Cigarettes and Water Samples.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Spundana Malla; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 7.711

10.  Nicotine Replacement, Topography, and Smoking Phenotypes of E-cigarettes.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Valentina Souprountchouk; Amanda Kaufmann; Sonja Blazekovic; Frank Leone; Neal L Benowitz; Robert A Schnoll
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.