Literature DB >> 20644105

Next-generation sequencing technology reveals a characteristic pattern of molecular mutations in 72.8% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia by detecting frequent alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1.

Alexander Kohlmann1, Vera Grossmann, Hans-Ulrich Klein, Sonja Schindela, Tamara Weiss, Beray Kazak, Frank Dicker, Susanne Schnittger, Martin Dugas, Wolfgang Kern, Claudia Haferlach, Torsten Haferlach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy that is characterized by features of both a myeloproliferative neoplasm and a myelodysplastic syndrome. Thus far, data on a comprehensive cytogenetic or molecular genetic characterization are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Here, we analyzed 81 thoroughly characterized patients with CMML (CMML type 1, n = 45; CMML type 2, n = 36) by applying next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to investigate CBL, JAK2, MPL, NRAS, and KRAS at known mutational hotspot regions. In addition, complete coding regions were analyzed for RUNX1 (beta isoform) and TET2 aberrations.
RESULTS: Cytogenetic aberrations were found in 18.2% of patients (14 of 77 patients). In contrast, at least one molecular mutation was observed in 72.8% of patients (59 of 81 patients). A mean of 1.6 mutations per patient was observed by this unprecedented screening. In total, 105 variances were detected by this comprehensive molecular screening. After excluding known polymorphisms or silent mutations, 82 distinct mutations remained (CBL, n = 15; JAK2V617F, n = 8; MPL, n = 0; NRAS, n = 10; KRAS, n = 12; RUNX1, n = 7; and TET2, n = 41). With respect to clinical data, a better outcome was seen for patients carrying TET2 mutations (P = .013).
CONCLUSION: The number of molecular markers used to categorize myeloid neoplasms is constantly increasing. Here, NGS screening has been demonstrated to support a comprehensive characterization of the molecular background in CMML. A pattern of molecular mutations translates into different biologic and prognostic categories of CMML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20644105     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.1361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  106 in total

Review 1.  Applications of targeted gene capture and next-generation sequencing technologies in studies of human deafness and other genetic disabilities.

Authors:  Xi Lin; Wenxue Tang; Shoeb Ahmad; Jingqiao Lu; Candice C Colby; Jason Zhu; Qing Yu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  What Next? The Next Transit from Biology to Diagnostics: Next Generation Sequencing for Immunogenetics.

Authors:  Christian Gabriel; Stephanie Stabentheiner; Martin Danzer; Johannes Pröll
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Spliceosomal gene mutations are frequent events in the diverse mutational spectrum of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia but largely absent in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Sarah Abu Kar; Anna Jankowska; Hideki Makishima; Valeria Visconte; Andres Jerez; Yuka Sugimoto; Hideki Muramatsu; Fabiola Traina; Manuel Afable; Kathryn Guinta; Ramon V Tiu; Bartlomiej Przychodzen; Hirotoshi Sakaguchi; Seiji Kojima; Mikkael A Sekeres; Alan F List; Michael A McDevitt; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Additional mutations in SRSF2, ASXL1 and/or RUNX1 identify a high-risk group of patients with KIT D816V(+) advanced systemic mastocytosis.

Authors:  M Jawhar; J Schwaab; S Schnittger; M Meggendorfer; M Pfirrmann; K Sotlar; H-P Horny; G Metzgeroth; S Kluger; N Naumann; C Haferlach; T Haferlach; P Valent; W-K Hofmann; A Fabarius; N C P Cross; A Reiter
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Oncogenic Signaling by Leukemia-Associated Mutant Cbl Proteins.

Authors:  Scott Nadeau; Wei An; Nick Palermo; Dan Feng; Gulzar Ahmad; Lin Dong; Gloria E O Borgstahl; Amarnath Natarajan; Mayumi Naramura; Vimla Band; Hamid Band
Journal:  Biochem Anal Biochem       Date:  2012-07-30

Review 6.  Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: novel pathogenetic lesions.

Authors:  Hideki Muramatsu; Hideki Makishima; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  FISH analysis for TET2 deletion in a cohort of 362 Brazilian myeloid malignancies: correlation with karyotype abnormalities.

Authors:  Fábio Morato de Oliveira; Carlos Eduardo Miguel; Antônio Roberto Lucena-Araujo; Ana Silvia Gouvêa de Lima; Roberto Passetto Falcão; Eduardo Magalhães Rego
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Combined MEK and JAK inhibition abrogates murine myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Authors:  Guangyao Kong; Mark Wunderlich; David Yang; Erik A Ranheim; Ken H Young; Jinyong Wang; Yuan-I Chang; Juan Du; Yangang Liu; Sin Ruow Tey; Xinmin Zhang; Mark Juckett; Ryan Mattison; Alisa Damnernsawad; Jingfang Zhang; James C Mulloy; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Applicability of next-generation sequencing to decalcified formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia samples.

Authors:  Veronica Bernard; Niklas Gebauer; Thomas Dinh; Judith Stegemann; Alfred C Feller; Hartmut Merz
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15

10.  Level of RUNX1 activity is critical for leukemic predisposition but not for thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Iléana Antony-Debré; Vladimir T Manchev; Nathalie Balayn; Dominique Bluteau; Cécile Tomowiak; Céline Legrand; Thierry Langlois; Olivia Bawa; Lucie Tosca; Gérard Tachdjian; Bruno Leheup; Najet Debili; Isabelle Plo; Jason A Mills; Deborah L French; Mitchell J Weiss; Eric Solary; Remi Favier; William Vainchenker; Hana Raslova
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.