BACKGROUND: Screening for increased waist circumference and hypertriglyceridemia (the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype) has been proposed as an inexpensive approach to identify patients with excess intra-abdominal adiposity and associated metabolic abnormalities. We examined the relationship between the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype to the risk of coronary artery disease in apparently healthy individuals. METHODS: A total of 21,787 participants aged 45-79 years were followed for a mean of 9.8 (standard deviation 1.7) years. Coronary artery disease developed in 2109 of them during follow-up. The hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype was defined as a waist circumference of 90 cm or more and a triglyceride level of 2.0 mmol/L or more in men, and a waist circumference of 85 cm or more and a triglyceride level of 1.5 mmol/L or more in women. RESULTS: Compared with participants who had a waist circumference and triglyceride level below the threshold, those with the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype had higher blood pressure indices, higher levels of apolipoprotein B and C-reactive protein, lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I, and smaller low-density lipoprotein particles. Among men, those with the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype had an unadjusted hazard ratio for future coronary artery disease of 2.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-2.87) compared with men who did not have the phenotype. Women with the phenotype had an unadjusted hazard ratio of 3.84 (95% CI 3.20-4.62) compared with women who did not have the phenotype. INTERPRETATION: Among participants from a European cohort representative of a contemporary Western population, the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype was associated with a deteriorated cardiometabolic risk profile and an increased risk for coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: Screening for increased waist circumference and hypertriglyceridemia (the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype) has been proposed as an inexpensive approach to identify patients with excess intra-abdominal adiposity and associated metabolic abnormalities. We examined the relationship between the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype to the risk of coronary artery disease in apparently healthy individuals. METHODS: A total of 21,787 participants aged 45-79 years were followed for a mean of 9.8 (standard deviation 1.7) years. Coronary artery disease developed in 2109 of them during follow-up. The hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype was defined as a waist circumference of 90 cm or more and a triglyceride level of 2.0 mmol/L or more in men, and a waist circumference of 85 cm or more and a triglyceride level of 1.5 mmol/L or more in women. RESULTS: Compared with participants who had a waist circumference and triglyceride level below the threshold, those with the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype had higher blood pressure indices, higher levels of apolipoprotein B and C-reactive protein, lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I, and smaller low-density lipoprotein particles. Among men, those with the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype had an unadjusted hazard ratio for future coronary artery disease of 2.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-2.87) compared with men who did not have the phenotype. Women with the phenotype had an unadjusted hazard ratio of 3.84 (95% CI 3.20-4.62) compared with women who did not have the phenotype. INTERPRETATION: Among participants from a European cohort representative of a contemporary Western population, the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype was associated with a deteriorated cardiometabolic risk profile and an increased risk for coronary artery disease.
Authors: Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Stephen R Daniels; Karen A Donato; Robert H Eckel; Barry A Franklin; David J Gordon; Ronald M Krauss; Peter J Savage; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Fernando Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Leonelo Bautista; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Patrick Commerford; Chim C Lang; Zvonko Rumboldt; Churchill L Onen; Liu Lisheng; Supachai Tanomsup; Paul Wangai; Fahad Razak; Arya M Sharma; Sonia S Anand Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-11-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: László B Tankó; Yu Z Bagger; Gerong Qin; Peter Alexandersen; Philip J Larsen; Claus Christiansen Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-04-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M C Pouliot; J P Després; S Lemieux; S Moorjani; C Bouchard; A Tremblay; A Nadeau; P J Lupien Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1994-03-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Wim A van der Steeg; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Evan A Stein; Karim El-Harchaoui; Erik S G Stroes; Manjinder S Sandhu; Nicholas J Wareham; J Wouter Jukema; Robert Luben; Aeilko H Zwinderman; John J P Kastelein; Kay-Tee Khaw Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Beatriz Cepeda-Valery; Gregg S Pressman; Vincent M Figueredo; Abel Romero-Corral Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Nicolas Amabile; Susan Cheng; Jean Marie Renard; Martin G Larson; Anahita Ghorbani; Elizabeth McCabe; Gabriel Griffin; Coralie Guerin; Jennifer E Ho; Stanley Y Shaw; Kenneth S Cohen; Ramachandran S Vasan; Alain Tedgui; Chantal M Boulanger; Thomas J Wang Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sophia S K Yu; Natalie L M Ramsey; Darleen C Castillo; Madia Ricks; Anne E Sumner Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 1.894