Literature DB >> 20643250

Safety and cost-effectiveness of same day permanent pacemaker implantation.

Faizel Osman1, Suresh Krishnamoorthy, Adnan Nadir, Phillip Mullin, Adrian Morley-Davies, John Creamer.   

Abstract

An overnight stay after permanent pacemaker implantation has major cost implications for healthcare systems. Same day pacing could be effective in alleviating this. We evaluated our elective same day pacing practice to determine safety and cost-effectiveness. A total of 780 patients were scheduled for elective new permanent pacemaker implantation as a same day procedure at the University Hospital, North Staffordshire, from April 2001 to December 2006. The mean age +/- SEM of the cohort was 73.8 +/- 0.4 years (464 men and 316 women). Single-chamber devices were implanted in 272 (27 atrial and 245 ventricular) and dual chamber in 508 patients. Vascular access was by the subclavian vein in 431 patients and the cephalic vein in 349. Preimplant intravenous antibiotics were administered to 28% and perioperative antibiotics to the remainder; all patients received oral antibiotics after implantation. Of the 780 patients, 41 (5.3%) required an in-hospital stay after implantation because of hematoma formation in 12, pneumothorax in 3, social reasons for 7, observation at the physicians request but no complication for 13, angina in 3, arrhythmia in 1, and warfarin therapy in 2. Immediate complications (<24 hours) occurred in 6 patients and early complications (>24 hours to 6 weeks) developed in 17. Of the 780 patients, 94 had died at mean follow-up of 2.4 +/- 0.1 years; none were related to pacemaker implantation. An overnight stay at our hospital costs pound203.60 ( approximately US$305). From November 2005 to November 2006, 109 patients underwent same day implantation, resulting in a cost saving of pound22,192.40 ( approximately US$34,500). In conclusion, same day permanent pacemaker implantation was feasible, safe, and cost-effective. It was associated with a low prevalence of complications and only a few patients required an overnight stay. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643250     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  The Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Implantation of MICRA Transcatheter Leadless Pacemaker System.

Authors:  Soroosh Kiani; George B Black; Birju Rao; Nancy Thakkar; Christopher Massad; Akshar V Patel; Marvin Louis Roy Lu; Faisal M Merchant; Michael H Hoskins; David B De Lurgio; Anshul M Patel; Anand D Shah; Angel R Leon; Stacy B Westerman; Michael S Lloyd; Mikhael F El-Chami
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-06-30

3.  Reversibility of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block with Revascularization in Coronary Artery Disease without Infarction: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Rhanderson Cardoso; Carlos E Alfonso; James O Coffey
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

Review 4.  Insertion of miniaturized cardiac monitors outside the catheter operating room: experience and practical advice.

Authors:  Jan Steffel; David Jay Wright; Harald Schäfer; Tabinda Rashid-Fadel; Thorsten Lewalter
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Day case complex devices: the state of the UK.

Authors:  Michael Waight; Abdula Elawady; Heather Gage; Morro Touray; Shaumik Adhya
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-04-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.