Literature DB >> 20643142

Methylated DNA causes a physical block to replication forks independently of damage signalling, O(6)-methylguanine or DNA single-strand breaks and results in DNA damage.

Petra Groth1, Simon Ausländer, Muntasir Mamun Majumder, Niklas Schultz, Fredrik Johansson, Eva Petermann, Thomas Helleday.   

Abstract

Even though DNA alkylating agents have been used for many decades in the treatment of cancer, it remains unclear what happens when replication forks encounter alkylated DNA. Here, we used the DNA fibre assay to study the impact of alkylating agents on replication fork progression. We found that the alkylator methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) inhibits replication elongation in a manner that is dose dependent and related to the overall alkylation grade. Replication forks seem to be completely blocked as no nucleotide incorporation can be detected following 1 h of MMS treatment. A high dose of 5 mM caffeine, inhibiting most DNA damage signalling, decreases replication rates overall but does not reverse MMS-induced replication inhibition, showing that the replication block is independent of DNA damage signalling. Furthermore, the block of replication fork progression does not correlate with the level of DNA single-strand breaks. Overexpression of O(6)-methylguanine (O6meG)-DNA methyltransferase protein, responsible for removing the most toxic alkylation, O6meG, did not affect replication elongation following exposure to N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. This demonstrates that O6meG lesions are efficiently bypassed in mammalian cells. In addition, we find that MMS-induced gammaH2AX foci co-localise with 53BP1 foci and newly replicated areas, suggesting that DNA double-strand breaks are formed at MMS-blocked replication forks. Altogether, our data suggest that N-alkylations formed during exposure to alkylating agents physically block replication fork elongation in mammalian cells, causing formation of replication-associated DNA lesions, likely double-strand breaks. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643142     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  40 in total

1.  ATM couples replication stress and metabolic reprogramming during cellular senescence.

Authors:  Katherine M Aird; Andrew J Worth; Nathaniel W Snyder; Joyce V Lee; Sharanya Sivanand; Qin Liu; Ian A Blair; Kathryn E Wellen; Rugang Zhang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Repair and translesion synthesis of O 6-alkylguanine DNA lesions in human cells.

Authors:  Hua Du; Pengcheng Wang; Lin Li; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Alkbh2 protects against lethality and mutation in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

Authors:  Stephanie L Nay; Dong-Hyun Lee; Steven E Bates; Timothy R O'Connor
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-03-17

Review 4.  DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells.

Authors:  Teruaki Iyama; David M Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-05-16

Review 5.  The endogenous exposome.

Authors:  Jun Nakamura; Esra Mutlu; Vyom Sharma; Leonard Collins; Wanda Bodnar; Rui Yu; Yongquan Lai; Benjamin Moeller; Kun Lu; James Swenberg
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-24

6.  The Shu complex is a conserved regulator of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Julieta Martino; Kara A Bernstein
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Histone tails decrease N7-methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine depurination and yield DNA-protein cross-links in nucleosome core particles and cells.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Daeyoon Park; Natalia Y Tretyakova; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Human CST abundance determines recovery from diverse forms of DNA damage and replication stress.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Jason Stewart; Carolyn M Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Cohesin association to replication sites depends on rad50 and promotes fork restart.

Authors:  Mireille Tittel-Elmer; Armelle Lengronne; Marta B Davidson; Julien Bacal; Philippe François; Marcel Hohl; John H J Petrini; Philippe Pasero; Jennifer A Cobb
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Nuclear pore protein NUP88 activates anaphase-promoting complex to promote aneuploidy.

Authors:  Ryan M Naylor; Karthik B Jeganathan; Xiuqi Cao; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.