Literature DB >> 20643030

Surgical management of varicose veins: meta-analysis.

Ranjeet Brar1, Ian M Nordon, Robert J Hinchliffe, Ian M Loftus, Matthew M Thompson.   

Abstract

Open surgery remains the gold standard by which endovascular treatment of superficial chronic venous insufficiency is measured. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reviews the current evidence base, comparing open and endovascular treatment of varicose veins. Systematic review of studies reporting duplex scan follow-up after open surgical, laser (endovenous laser therapy [EVLT]), or radiofrequency (VNUS Closure device, VNUS Medical Technologies, San Jose, CA) treatment of refluxing great saphenous veins was completed. Primary outcome measures were occlusion and complication rates and time taken to resume work. No significant difference in recurrence rates at 3 months between open surgery and EVLT (RR 2.19, 95% CI 0.99-4.85, p = .05) or VNUS device (RR 7.57; 95% CI 0.42-136.02) were found. Return to work is significantly faster following VNUS (by 8.24 days; 95% CI 10.50-5.97) or EVLT (by 5.02 days; 95% CI 6.52-3.52). Endovascular treatment of varicose veins is safe and effective and offers the significant advantage of rapid recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643030     DOI: 10.2310/6670.2010.00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vascular        ISSN: 1708-5381            Impact factor:   1.285


  9 in total

1.  Clinical results of endovenous LASER ablation (EVLA) using low linear endovenous energy density (LEED) combined with high ligation for great saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  Yoong-Seok Park; Young-Wook Kim; Yang-Jin Park; Dong-Ik Kim
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu; Margaret Horne; P Dominic F Dodd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 3.  Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Jean-François Fisette; Suzanne K Bédard; Marc-Antoine Despatis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Mechanochemical tumescentless endovenous ablation: final results of the initial clinical trial.

Authors:  S Elias; J K Raines
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.740

5.  Long-term efficacy of different procedures for treatment of varicose veins: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liqin Guo; Rong Huang; Dunyong Zhao; Guilian Xu; Hui Liu; Jian Yang; Tao Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Endovenous 1,940-nm Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Saphenous Veins.

Authors:  Insoo Park; Sun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-12-11

7.  Impact of radiofrequency ablation for patients with varicose veins on the budget of the German statutory health insurance system.

Authors:  Alexander Kuhlmann; Anne Prenzler; Jan Hacker; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2013-04-03

8.  The endovenous laser treatment for patients with varicose veins.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Liu; Long-Hua Fan; De-Chun Xu; Xu Li; Zhi-Hui Dong; Wei-Guo Fu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 9.  The Effectiveness of Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Application in Varicose Vein Diseases of the Lower Extremity.

Authors:  Fehimcan Sevil; Abdurrahim Colak; Münacettin Ceviz; Uğur Kaya; Necip Becit
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.