Literature DB >> 20643002

LigaSure versus conventional hemostasis in thyroid surgery: prospective randomized controlled trial.

Prabhjyot Singh1, Daniel O'Connell, Moran Langille, Peter Dziegielewski, Michael Allegretto, Jeffrey Harris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meticulous hemostasis is a critical and often time-consuming step of safe thyroid surgery. The LigaSure system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) is a diathermy hemostasis method that fuses vessel walls to form a collagen seal. Previous studies have shown reduced operative times in thyroidectomy using the LS system. The primary objective of the study was to compare operative times using the LS system to conventional titanium clips and surgical ties (CLTs). Secondary outcomes included vocal cord dysfunction, scores on the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), postoperative hypocalcemia, and operative costs between the two groups.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were block randomized to thyroidectomy with either the LS system or CLTs. Patient demographics, operative times, pre- and postoperative VHI scores, vocal cord endoscopy, and operative costs were collected on all patients. Patients were also monitored for clinically significant hypocalcemia postoperatively.
RESULTS: The mean operative time for CLTs was 68.6 minutes (SD 14.56) versus 68.5 minutes (SD 27.47) for the LS system, which was not statistically significant. VHI scores differed between CLTs and the LS system for the postoperative score only: CLT 19.83 (SD 19.81) versus LS 6.57 (SD 10.83). This was statistically significant, with p = .041. No difference was detected for hypocalcemia rates or endoscopic vocal cord dysfunction. The operative cost for the LS system was $387.15 (SD $11.93) and for the CLTs was $73.60 (SD $27.72), which was statistically significant (p < .001).
CONCLUSION: The use of the LS system in thyroidectomy did not reduce overall operative time by a clinically significant level, indicating limited utility in terms of cost reduction contradictory to current literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1916-0208


  6 in total

Review 1.  ENERgized vessel sealing systems versus CONventional hemostasis techniques in thyroid surgery--the ENERCON systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pietro Contin; Käthe Gooßen; Kathrin Grummich; Katrin Jensen; Hubertus Schmitz-Winnenthal; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  LigaSure small jaws versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy.

Authors:  Christoffer Holst Hahn; Christian Hjort Sørensen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Short- and long-term outcomes of LigaSure versus conventional surgery for curative gastric cancer resection: a matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Haiyang Zhou; Wei Yi; Jian Zhang; Weijun Wang; Yi Wang; Wenchao Gao; Zhiqian Hu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  A comparison of surgical outcomes and complications between hemostatic devices for thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingwei Luo; Xi Li; Jianwei Dong; Weifeng Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Efficacy and safety of LigaSure™ small jaw instrument in thyroidectomy: a 1-year prospective observational study.

Authors:  Xiao-Chun Mao; Chao Chen; Ke-Jing Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Is sutureless thyroid surgery safe in the hands of surgical trainees. A single centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Dirk R Wassenberg
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.