Literature DB >> 20642370

Differences between long-acting insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Michael Gejl Jensen1, Mikkel Hansen, Birgitte Brock, Jørgen Rungby.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Most guidelines suggest that failure of oral antidiabetic drugs should be followed by the addition of a basal insulin with aggressive titration of the dose. In most countries, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-insulin, glargine and detemir are the only choices. Clinical trials show that the metabolism and metabolic outcomes after treatment with intermediate- or long-acting insulins differ little. Despite this, the hypoglycaemic potential, effect on body weight and adherence to insulin treatment may affect the choice of basal insulin. Adherence seems to be negatively correlated to the prescribed dose and the number of injections. Furthermore, the choice of basal insulin might be influenced by the number of units necessary to achieve the goal for HbA1c. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: By searching the literature systematically, we identified all randomised clinical trials comparing long-acting insulins (human NPH-insulin and the analogues glargine and detemir) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes conducted over the last 10 years. We continued by reviewing only studies in which similar antihyperglycaemic potential of the treatments was achieved. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: According to the inclusion criteria for this review, all drugs were efficacious regarding the main purpose of decreasing glycaemia. For an equal efficacy, we were able to detect other differences between the treatments and, furthermore, an estimate on the number of units of insulin needed to achieve comparable glycaemic control. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The analysis confirmed a favourable profile of both analogues regarding hypoglycaemia. For detemir, we additionally identified a favourable profile regarding weight gain and need for an increased number of units of insulin to achieve comparable glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) responses. We conclude that the efficacy of insulin treatment seems to vary little between the available products, however doses needed to achieve similar effects vary; units used per HbA1c reduction could be a relevant parameter for the choice of insulin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20642370     DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2010.494831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother        ISSN: 1465-6566            Impact factor:   3.889


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nanomedicines based on recombinant fusion proteins for targeting therapeutic siRNA oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Johannes Winkler
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2011-07

Review 2.  [Insulin therapy of diabetes].

Authors:  Monika Lechleitner; Michael Roden; Raimund Weitgasser; Bernhard Ludvik; Peter Fasching; Friedrich Hoppichler; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Guntram Schernthaner; Rudolf Prager; Thomas C Wascher
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Long-acting basal insulin analogs: latest developments and clinical usefulness.

Authors:  Anastasia N Mavrogiannaki; Ilias N Migdalis
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  Insulin therapy.

Authors:  Monika Lechleitner; Friedrich Hoppichler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-05-23

5.  [Insulin therapy of diabetes].

Authors:  Monika Lechleitner; Michael Roden; Raimund Weitgasser; Bernhard Ludvik; Peter Fasching; Friedrich Hoppichler; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Guntram Schernthaner; Rudolf Prager; Thomas C Wascher
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  (Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Thomas Semlitsch; Jennifer Engler; Andrea Siebenhofer; Klaus Jeitler; Andrea Berghold; Karl Horvath
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-09

7.  Insulin degludec/insulin aspart administered once daily at any meal, with insulin aspart at other meals versus a standard basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 26-week, phase 3, randomized, open-label, treat-to-target trial.

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch; Bruce Bode; Jean-Pierre Courreges; Patrik Dykiel; Edward Franek; Kjeld Hermansen; Allen King; Henriette Mersebach; Melanie Davies
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) raises blood-brain glucose transfer capacity and hexokinase activity in human brain.

Authors:  Michael Gejl; Susanne Lerche; Lærke Egefjord; Birgitte Brock; Niels Møller; Kim Vang; Anders B Rodell; Bo M Bibby; Jens J Holst; Jørgen Rungby; Albert Gjedde
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2013-03-27

9.  Safety and efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart with bolus mealtime insulin aspart compared with standard basal-bolus treatment in people with Type 1 diabetes: 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial (BOOST® T1).

Authors:  I B Hirsch; E Franek; H Mersebach; L Bardtrum; K Hermansen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.