Literature DB >> 20642307

2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct".

.   

Abstract

The following amendments to the 2002 "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (the Ethics Code; American Psychological Association, 2002) were adopted by the APA Council of Representatives at its February 2010 meeting. The changes involve the last two sentences of the final paragraph of the Introduction and Applicability section and Ethical Standards 1.02 and 1.03. The amendments became effective June 1, 2010. A history of these amendments to the Ethics Code is provided in the "Report of the Ethics Committee, 2009" in this issue of the American Psychologist (American Psychological Association, Ethics Committee, 2010). Following are a clean version of the revisions and a version indicating changes from the 2002 language (inserted text is underlined; deleted text is crossed out). 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20642307     DOI: 10.1037/a0020168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  19 in total

1.  Adversarial allegiance: The devil is in the evidence details, not just on the witness stand.

Authors:  Bradley D McAuliff; Jeana L Arter
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2016-05-30

2.  Informed Consent: An Ethical Issue in Conducting Research with Male Partner Violent Offenders.

Authors:  Cory A Crane; Samuel W Hawes; Dolores Mandel; Caroline J Easton
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2013

3.  Relative or absolute? A significant intervention for chlamydia screening with small absolute benefit.

Authors:  William C Miller; Nadia L Nguyen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Community-based participatory research (CBPR): Towards equitable involvement of community in psychology research.

Authors:  Susan E Collins; Seema L Clifasefi; Joey Stanton; Kee J E Straits; Eleanor Gil-Kashiwabara; Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa; Andel V Nicasio; Michele P Andrasik; Starlyn M Hawes; Kimberly A Miller; Lonnie A Nelson; Victoria E Orfaly; Bonnie M Duran; Nina Wallerstein
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2018-01-22

5.  Navigating the ethics of Internet-guided self-help interventions.

Authors:  A Maya Borgueta; Clare K Purvis; Michelle G Newman
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  How Do Family Court Judges Theorize about Parental Alienation? A Qualitative Exploration of the Territory.

Authors:  Telma M Marques; Isabel Narciso; Luana C Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  Integrating yoga into psychotherapy: The ethics of moving from the mind to the mat.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Kamradt
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.446

8.  Controlled trial of an Internet-based intervention for overweight teens (Next.Step): effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Sousa; Helena Fonseca; Pedro Gaspar; Filomena Gaspar
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  A Teleneuropsychology Protocol for the Cognitive Assessment of Older Adults During COVID-19.

Authors:  Marcela Kitaigorodsky; David Loewenstein; Rosie Curiel Cid; Elizabeth Crocco; Katherine Gorman; Christian González-Jiménez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  Comparison of text and video computer-tailored interventions for smoking cessation: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicola Stanczyk; Catherine Bolman; Mathieu van Adrichem; Math Candel; Jean Muris; Hein de Vries
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.