Literature DB >> 20641144

Visualizing and assessing discrimination in the logistic regression model.

Patrick Royston1, Douglas G Altman.   

Abstract

Logistic regression models are widely used in medicine for predicting patient outcome (prognosis) and constructing diagnostic tests (diagnosis). Multivariable logistic models yield an (approximately) continuous risk score, a transformation of which gives the estimated event probability for an individual. A key aspect of model performance is discrimination, that is, the model's ability to distinguish between patients who have (or will have) an event of interest and those who do not (or will not). Graphical aids are important in understanding a logistic model. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve is familiar, but not necessarily easy to interpret. We advocate a simple graphic that provides further insight into discrimination, namely a histogram or dot plot of the risk score in the outcome groups. The most popular performance measure for the logistic model is the c-index, numerically equivalent to the area under the ROC curve. We discuss the comparative merits of the c-index and the (standardized) mean difference in risk score between the outcome groups. The latter statistic, sometimes known generically as the effect size, has been computed in slightly different ways by several different authors, including Glass, Cohen and Hedges. An alternative measure is the overlap between the distributions in the outcome groups, defined as the area under the minimum of the two density functions. The larger the overlap, the weaker the discrimination. Under certain assumptions about the distribution of the risk score, the c-index, effect size and overlap are functionally related. We illustrate the ideas with simulated and real data sets.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20641144     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  A risk score for the prediction of advanced age-related macular degeneration: development and validation in 2 prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Chiu; Paul Mitchell; Ronald Klein; Barbara E Klein; Min-Lee Chang; Gary Gensler; Allen Taylor
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Karol M Pencina; A Cecile J W Janssens; Philip Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Yvonne Vergouwe
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Do I Need to Operate on That in the Middle of the Night? Development of a Nomogram for the Diagnosis of Severe Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Mattia Portinari; Michele Scagliarini; Giorgia Valpiani; Simona Bianconcini; Dario Andreotti; Rocco Stano; Paolo Carcoforo; Savino Occhionorelli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Major Depression Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beirut, and Its Association with Structural and Sexual Minority-Related Stressors, and Social Support.

Authors:  Glenn J Wagner; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Cynthia El Khoury; Carol Abi Ghanem; Elie Balan; Susan Kegeles; Matt G Mutchler; Jacques Mokhbat
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2018-08-24

6.  Tumor metabolism assessed by FDG-PET/CT and tumor proliferation assessed by genomic grade index to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux; L Biard; J Lehmann-Che; L Teixeira; F A Bouhidel; B Poirot; P Bertheau; P Merlet; M Espié; M Resche-Rigon; C Sotiriou; P de Cremoux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Risk and treatment effect heterogeneity: re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 large clinical trials.

Authors:  David M Kent; Jason Nelson; Issa J Dahabreh; Peter M Rothwell; Douglas G Altman; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Mortality predicted accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with hepatic resection using artificial neural network.

Authors:  Herng-Chia Chiu; Te-Wei Ho; King-Teh Lee; Hong-Yaw Chen; Wen-Hsien Ho
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-04-30

9.  Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Development and validation of the OUTCoV score to predict the risk of hospitalisation among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in ambulatory settings: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Frederique Jacquerioz; Stéphanie Baggio; Angele Gayet-Ageron; François Chappuis; Laurent Getaz; Idris Guessous; Laurent Kaiser; Nathalie Vernaz; Sabine Yerly; Julien Salamun; Herve Spechbach
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.