Literature DB >> 20641068

Anatomical differentiation of direct and indirect inguinal hernias: Is it worthwhile in the modern era?

P Sanjay1, J L Fulke, I A Shaikh, A Woodward.   

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the clinical accuracy of differentiating direct and indirect inguinal hernias preoperatively by different grades of surgeons. A retrospective audit was conducted over a 9-year period and comprised all adult inguinal hernia patients operated by one consultant surgeon. The hernias were differentiated into direct and indirect hernias based on the direction of cough impulse and the deep ring occlusion test. The preoperative diagnosis was compared with intraoperative findings. During the study period, 503 patients were examined. Of these, 272 patients were diagnosed as having indirect hernias and 56 patients as having direct hernias. In 175 patients, no attempt was made to differentiate indirect and direct hernias. When compared with intraoperative findings, the diagnosis was correct in 77% of the indirect hernias and 55% of direct hernias. Of the patients in whom no differentiation was attempted, 115 patients had indirect hernias, 56 had direct hernias, and four had both. For indirect hernias, the diagnostic accuracy was 82, 63, and 30% for consultant, registrars, and senior house officers. For direct hernias, the diagnostic accuracy was 66, 50, and 44%, respectively. This study demonstrates relatively poor accuracy in diagnosing direct inguinal hernias regardless of seniority.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct hernia; hernia; indirect hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20641068     DOI: 10.1002/ca.21022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  4 in total

1.  EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.

Authors:  M M Poelman; B van den Heuvel; J D Deelder; G S A Abis; N Beudeker; R R Bittner; G Campanelli; D van Dam; B J Dwars; H H Eker; A Fingerhut; I Khatkov; F Koeckerling; J F Kukleta; M Miserez; A Montgomery; R M Munoz Brands; S Morales Conde; F E Muysoms; M Soltes; W Tromp; Y Yavuz; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the usage and influence of groin ultrasound in primary and secondary healthcare settings.

Authors:  B Kim; P Robinson; H Modi; H Gupta; K Horgan; R Achuthan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  A new accurate method of physical examination for differentiation of inguinal hernia types.

Authors:  Wouter G Tromp; Baukje van den Heuvel; Boudewijn J Dwars
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Macroscopic demonstration of the male urogenital system with evidence of a direct inguinal hernia utilizing room temperature plastination.

Authors:  Victor A Ruthig; Steven Labrash; Scott Lozanoff; Monika A Ward
Journal:  Anatomy       Date:  2016-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.