Literature DB >> 20640354

Long-term fluoride release from resin-reinforced orthodontic cements following recharge with fluoride solution.

Rogério Lacerda dos Santos1, Matheus Melo Pithon, Delmo Santiago Vaitsman, Mônica Tirre de Souza Araújo, Margareth Maria Gomes de Souza, Matilde Gonçalves da Cunha Nojima.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the fluoride release behavior of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements before or after fluoride recharge. The materials were divided into 5 groups: 2 resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements used for attaching orthodontic bands, that is, group FOB (Fuji Ortho Band) and group MCB (Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer Orthodontic Band Cement); 2 resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements and a composite used for bonding orthodontic brackets, that is, group OGLC (Ortho Glass LC), group FOLC (Fuji Ortho LC), and group TXT (Transbond XT), respectively. Fluoride release was measured during a 60-day period by using selective ion electrodes connected to an ionic analyser. After 4 weeks, the samples were exposed to 0.221% sodium fluoride solution. The results showed that cements achieved a maximum fluoride release 24 h after initial setting. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups FOB and OGLC regarding the amount of released fluoride following fluoride recharge from day 31 to day 36 (p>0.05). In conclusion, FOB and OGLC cements showed a higher capacity of capturing and releasing fluoride compared to the other cements studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20640354     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000200002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  6 in total

1.  In-vitro evaluation of an experimental method for bonding of orthodontic brackets with self-adhesive resin cements.

Authors:  Barat Ali Ramazanzadeh; Mohsen Merati; Hooman Shafaee; Leon Dogon; Keyvan Sohrabi
Journal:  European J Gen Dent       Date:  2013

2.  Does chlorhexidine in different formulations interfere with the force of orthodontic elastics?

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Dandara Andrade Santana; Kássio Henrique Sousa; Isa Mara Andrade Oliveira Farias
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effectiveness of fluoride sealant in the prevention of carious lesions around orthodontic brackets: an OCT evaluation.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Mariana de Jesus Santos; Camilla Andrade de Souza; Jorge César Borges Leão Filho; Ana Karla Souza Braz; Renato Evangelista de Araujo; Orlando Motohiro Tanaka; Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

4.  Influence of resin-modified glass ionomer and topical fluoride on levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva and biofilm adjacent to metallic brackets.

Authors:  Marcela Cristina Damião Andrucioli; Gisele Faria; Paulo Nelson-Filho; Fábio Lourenço Romano; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Fluoride Release from Two High-Viscosity Glass Ionomers after Exposure to Fluoride Slurry and Varnish.

Authors:  Hani M Nassar; Jeffrey A Platt
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Effect of different concentrations of papain gel on orthodontic bracket bonding.

Authors:  Matheus M Pithon; Caio S Ferraz; Gabriel D Couto Oliveira; Adrielle M Dos Santos
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.