Literature DB >> 20639806

The development of a screening instrument to select patients at risk of residual complaints after lumbar disc surgery.

J J den Boer1, R A B Oostendorp, A W M Evers, T Beems, G F Borm, M Munneke.   

Abstract

AIM: A considerable number of patients who undergo surgery for a lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) continue to experience disability, pain, and loss of work capacity. The goal of the study is to develop a brief screening instrument to identify these patients at risk of residual complaints.
METHODS: In a prospective study of 277 patients, the predictors for the outcomes disability, pain, and loss of work capacity were investigated. The best predictive model was constructed using a stepwise selection procedure (forward selection), which calculates the discriminative power of the model. Based on the relationship between regression coefficients, a clinical prediction rule was derived that predicted the probability of residual complaints after surgery for LRS.
RESULTS: At 6 month follow-up 141 patients (51%) had residual complaints. The discriminative power of the instrument was .78 (AUC). The "Nijmegen Outcome of Lumbar Disc surgery Screening-instrument" (NOLDS) was based on the variables "lower education level", "younger age", "pain 3 days postoperatively", "passive pain coping", and "fear of movement/(re)injury".
CONCLUSION: The results of the study are promising, showing that a brief clinical screening instrument can be used to identify patients at risk of residual complaints at 6 months after surgery for LRS. The early identification of patients at risk having residual complaints may make it possible to start tailored treatment early in the rehabilitation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Teddy Oosterhuis; Leonardo O P Costa; Christopher G Maher; Henrica C W de Vet; Maurits W van Tulder; Raymond W J G Ostelo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 2.  Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.

Authors:  Elke Veirman; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Annick De Paepe; Olivia J Kirtley; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-11

3.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery (REALISE): design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Teddy Oosterhuis; Maurits van Tulder; Wilco Peul; Judith Bosmans; Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp; Lidwien Smakman; Mark Arts; Raymond Ostelo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Baseline Patient Characteristics Commonly Captured Before Surgery Do Not Accurately Predict Long-Term Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy Followed by Physiotherapy.

Authors:  Stijn J Willems; Michel W Coppieters; Servan Rooker; Martijn W Heymans; Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.