Literature DB >> 20639565

Use of generic antiretroviral agents and cost savings in PEPFAR treatment programs.

Charles B Holmes1, William Coggin, David Jamieson, Heidi Mihm, Reuben Granich, Phillip Savio, Michael Hope, Caroline Ryan, Michele Moloney-Kitts, Eric P Goosby, Mark Dybul.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: One of the biggest hurdles to the rapid scale-up of antiretroviral therapy in the developing world was the price of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). Modification of an existing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) process to expedite review and approval of generic ARVs quickly resulted in a large number of FDA-tentatively approved ARVs available for use by the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the uptake of generic ARVs among PEPFAR-supported programs in Guyana, Haiti, Vietnam, and 13 countries in Africa, and changes over time in ARV use and costs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An annual survey from 2005 to 2008 of ARVs purchased in 16 countries by PEPFAR implementing and procurement partners (organizations using PEPFAR funding to purchase ARVs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Drug expenditures, ARV types and volumes (assessed per pack, a 1-month supply), proportion of generic procurement across years and countries, and cost savings from generic procurement.
RESULTS: ARV expenditures increased from $116.8 million (2005) to $202.2 million (2008); and procurement increased from 6.2 million to 22.1 million monthly packs. The proportion spent on generic ARVs increased from 9.17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.17%-9.18%) in 2005 to 76.41% (95% CI, 76.41%-76.42%) in 2008 (P < .001), and the proportion of generic packs procured increased from 14.8% (95% CI, 14.79%-14.84%) in 2005 to 89.33% (95% CI, 89.32%-89.34%) in 2008 (P < .001). In 2008, there were 8 PEPFAR programs that procured at least 90.0% of ARV packs in generic form; South Africa had the lowest generic procurement (24.7%; 95% CI, 24.6%-24.8%). Procurement of generic fixed-dose combinations increased from 33.3% (95% CI, 33.24%-33.43%) in 2005 to 42.73% (95% CI, 42.71%-42.75%) in 2008. Estimated yearly savings generated through generic ARV use were $8,108,444 in 2005, $24,940,014 in 2006, $75,645,816 in 2007, and $214,648,982 in 2008, a total estimated savings of $323,343,256.
CONCLUSION: Among PEPFAR-supported programs in 16 countries, availability of generic ARVs was associated with increased ARV procurement and substantial estimated cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639565     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  30 in total

1.  Massive benefits of antiretroviral therapy in Africa.

Authors:  Sten H Vermund
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  The impact of external donor support through the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief on the cost of red cell concentrate in Namibia, 2004-2011.

Authors:  John P Pitman; Adele Bocking; Robert Wilkinson; Maarten J Postma; Sridhar V Basavaraju; Bjorn von Finckenstein; Mary Mataranyika; Anthony A Marfin; David W Lowrance; Cees Th Smit Sibinga
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Superior outcomes and lower outpatient costs with scale-up of antiretroviral therapy at the GHESKIO clinic in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.

Authors:  Cynthia Riviere; Elizabeth Faust; Thane Miller; Eduard J Beck; Elaine Baruwa; Patrice Severe; Karine Severe; Claudia Thomas Riché; Rachelle Cassagnol; Sidney Atwood; Morgan Esperance; Lauren Webster; Pierre Cremieux; Jean W Pape; Serena P Koenig
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 4.  Past and Future Performance: PEPFAR in the Landscape of Foreign Aid for Health.

Authors:  Eran Bendavid
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.071

5.  Disposition of amodiaquine and desethylamodiaquine in HIV-infected Nigerian subjects on nevirapine-containing antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Kimberly K Scarsi; Fatai A Fehintola; Qing Ma; Francesca T Aweeka; Kristin M Darin; Gene D Morse; Ibrahim Temitope Akinola; Waheed A Adedeji; Niklas Lindegardh; Joel Tarning; Oladosu Ojengbede; Isaac F Adewole; Babafemi Taiwo; Robert L Murphy; Olusegun O Akinyinka; Sunil Parikh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  The cost of providing comprehensive HIV treatment in PEPFAR-supported programs.

Authors:  Nicolas A Menzies; Andres A Berruti; Richard Berzon; Scott Filler; Robert Ferris; Tedd V Ellerbrock; John M Blandford
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  HIV as a chronic disease considerations for service planning in resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Lucy Reynolds
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 8.  Antiretroviral drugs in pediatric HIV-infected patients: pharmacokinetic and practical challenges.

Authors:  B Ryan Phelps; Natella Rakhmanina
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Pediatric treatment 2.0: ensuring a holistic response to caring for HIV-exposed and infected children.

Authors:  Shaffiq M Essajee; Stephen M Arpadi; Eric J Dziuban; Raul Gonzalez-Montero; Shirin Heidari; David G Jamieson; Scott E Kellerman; Emilia Koumans; Atieno Ojoo; Emilia Rivadeneira; Stephen A Spector; Helena Walkowiak
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  The clinical and economic impact of genotype testing at first-line antiretroviral therapy failure for HIV-infected patients in South Africa.

Authors:  Julie H Levison; Robin Wood; Callie A Scott; Andrea L Ciaranello; Neil A Martinson; Corina Rusu; Elena Losina; Kenneth A Freedberg; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.