Alvaro Alonso1, Giancarlo Logroscino, Miguel A Hernán. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, USA. aalogut@alumni.unav.es
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have provided inconsistent results on the association of cigarette smoking with the incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). To summarise published evidence and explore sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated this association. METHODS: Published studies evaluating the association of smoking with incidence of ALS were searched in bibliographic databases, with relevant information collected from each article. A random effects approach was used to pool the relative rate (RR) estimates from different studies. Between study heterogeneity was explored with a meta-regression approach. RESULTS: 18 publications reported associations between smoking and ALS risk in 15 case control studies and five cohort studies. The pooled RR (95% CI) of ALS was 1.28 (0.97 to 1.68) for current versus never smokers and 1.12 (0.98 to 1.27) for ever versus never smokers. The study specifics RRs were heterogeneous (p<0.01). The proportion of women in the study population explained 46% of between study variability. The estimated RR (95% CI) of ALS for ever versus never smokers was 0.86 (0.71 to 1.03) in men and 1.66 (1.31 to 2.10) in women. INTERPRETATION: This meta-analysis does not support an overall strong association of smoking with ALS risk but suggests that smoking might be associated with a higher risk of ALS in women.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have provided inconsistent results on the association of cigarette smoking with the incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). To summarise published evidence and explore sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated this association. METHODS: Published studies evaluating the association of smoking with incidence of ALS were searched in bibliographic databases, with relevant information collected from each article. A random effects approach was used to pool the relative rate (RR) estimates from different studies. Between study heterogeneity was explored with a meta-regression approach. RESULTS: 18 publications reported associations between smoking and ALS risk in 15 case control studies and five cohort studies. The pooled RR (95% CI) of ALS was 1.28 (0.97 to 1.68) for current versus never smokers and 1.12 (0.98 to 1.27) for ever versus never smokers. The study specifics RRs were heterogeneous (p<0.01). The proportion of women in the study population explained 46% of between study variability. The estimated RR (95% CI) of ALS for ever versus never smokers was 0.86 (0.71 to 1.03) in men and 1.66 (1.31 to 2.10) in women. INTERPRETATION: This meta-analysis does not support an overall strong association of smoking with ALS risk but suggests that smoking might be associated with a higher risk of ALS in women.
Authors: Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Ryan M Seals; Ole Gredal; Murray A Mittleman; Johnni Hansen; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: Ximena Paez-Colasante; Claudia Figueroa-Romero; Stacey A Sakowski; Stephen A Goutman; Eva L Feldman Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Ran S Rotem; Ryan M Seals; Ole Gredal; Johnni Hansen; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Aisha S Dickerson; Johnni Hansen; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Aaron J Specht; Ole Gredal; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Aisha S Dickerson; Johnni Hansen; Aaron J Specht; Ole Gredal; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.402