Literature DB >> 20638867

The endovascular coronary sinus catheter in minimally invasive mitral and tricuspid valve surgery: a case series.

Jean-Sébastien Lebon1, Pierre Couture, Antoine G Rochon, Eric Laliberté, Julie Harvey, Nathalie Aubé, Mariève Cossette, Denis Bouchard, Hugues Jeanmart, Michel Pellerin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a standardized approach to the use of an endovascular coronary sinus (CS) catheter during minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
DESIGN: Case series.
SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing mitral and/or tricuspid valve surgery using a minimally invasive cardiac surgery approach.
INTERVENTIONS: An endovascular CS catheter was placed to enable the administration of retrograde cardioplegia using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), fluoroscopy, and CS pressure measurements.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected from 96 patient records. A total of 95 (99.0%) endovascular coronary sinus catheters were positioned. The mean time to insert the catheter into the sinus ostium under TEE guidance was 6.3 ± 8.4 minutes. Confirmation of adequate positioning with fluoroscopy took an average of 9.1 ± 10.6 minutes for a mean total procedure time of 16.1 ± 14.1 minutes. Successful positioning, as defined by the ability to generate a perfusion pressure in the CS greater than 30 mmHg during surgery, was achieved in 87.5% of cases. During positioning, ventricularization of the CS pressure curve was observed in 86.0% of cases. The presence of ventricularization was associated with an increase in positioning success (odds ratio = 15.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.713-67.239). One patient developed extravasation of contrast agent after CS catheter placement, without evidence of CS rupture.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular CS catheter insertion can be performed with a high rate of success for positioning and a low complication rate. During positioning, obtaining ventricularization is associated with an increased success rate. Crown
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20638867     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  3 in total

Review 1.  Robotically assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kaushik Mandal; Hazaim Alwair; Wiley L Nifong; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center.

Authors:  Satoshi Hanada; Hajime Sakamoto; Michael Swerczek; Kenichi Ueda
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 3.  Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Abdelbar; Ayman Kenawy; Joseph Zacharias
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.