OBJECTIVE: Multi-rater assessment with gap analysis is a powerful method for assessing communication skills and self-insight, and enhancing self-reflection. We demonstrate the use of this methodology. METHODS: The Program for the Approach to Complex Encounters (PACE) is an interdisciplinary simulation-based communication skills program. Encounters are assessed using an expanded Kalamazoo Consensus Statement Essential Elements Checklist adapted for multi-rater feedback and gap analysis. Data from a representative conversation were analyzed. RESULTS: Likert and forced-choice data with gap analysis are used to assess performance. Participants were strong in Demonstrating Empathy and Providing Closure, and needed to improve Relationship Building, Gathering Information, and understanding the Patient's/Family's Perspective. Participants under-appraised their abilities in Relationship Building, Providing Closure, and Demonstrating Empathy, as well as their overall performance. The conversion of these results into verbal feedback is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an evaluation methodology using multi-rater assessment with gap analysis to assess communication skills and self-insight. This methodology enables faculty to identify undervalued skills and perceptual blind spots, provide comprehensive, data driven, feedback, and encourage reflection. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Implementation of graphical feedback forms coupled with one-on-one discussion using the above methodology has the potential to enhance trainee self-awareness and reflection, improving the impact of educational programs. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Multi-rater assessment with gap analysis is a powerful method for assessing communication skills and self-insight, and enhancing self-reflection. We demonstrate the use of this methodology. METHODS: The Program for the Approach to Complex Encounters (PACE) is an interdisciplinary simulation-based communication skills program. Encounters are assessed using an expanded Kalamazoo Consensus Statement Essential Elements Checklist adapted for multi-rater feedback and gap analysis. Data from a representative conversation were analyzed. RESULTS: Likert and forced-choice data with gap analysis are used to assess performance. Participants were strong in Demonstrating Empathy and Providing Closure, and needed to improve Relationship Building, Gathering Information, and understanding the Patient's/Family's Perspective. Participants under-appraised their abilities in Relationship Building, Providing Closure, and Demonstrating Empathy, as well as their overall performance. The conversion of these results into verbal feedback is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an evaluation methodology using multi-rater assessment with gap analysis to assess communication skills and self-insight. This methodology enables faculty to identify undervalued skills and perceptual blind spots, provide comprehensive, data driven, feedback, and encourage reflection. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Implementation of graphical feedback forms coupled with one-on-one discussion using the above methodology has the potential to enhance trainee self-awareness and reflection, improving the impact of educational programs. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: David A Turner; Richard B Mink; K Jane Lee; Margaret K Winkler; Sara L Ross; Christoph P Hornik; Jennifer J Schuette; Katherine Mason; Stephanie A Storgion; Denise M Goodman Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Ellen C Meltzer; Zhenzhen Shi; Alexandra Suppes; Jennifer E Hersh; Jay D Orlander; Aaron W Calhoun; Judy Tung; Lia Logio; Ruth Manna; Philip A Bialer; Cathleen A Acres; Joseph J Fins Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2017-08
Authors: Anna Beatriz C N Amaral; Elizabeth A Rider; Paula P Lajolo; Luiz G Tone; Rogerio M C Pinto; Marisa P Lajolo; Aaron W Calhoun Journal: Int J Med Educ Date: 2016-12-11