OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Global Postural Re-education (GPR) on stress urinary incontinence symptoms and to compare it to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT). STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-two women with stress urinary incontinence were distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) was submitted to weekly sessions of GPR for three months and Group 2 (G2) performed Pelvic Floor Muscle Training four times a week for three months. Patients were evaluated through the King's Health Questionnaire, a three-day voiding diary including daily pad use and a Functional Evaluation of the Pelvic Floor (FEPF), before treatment (T0), at the end of treatment (T1) and six months after treatment (T2). RESULTS: The number of leaking episodes dropped significantly in both groups at the end of treatment and at six months follow-up, with a significantly greater decrease in G1. Daily pad use dropped significantly in both groups. At the end of treatment, 72% of the patients in G1 and 41% of the patients in G2 needed no pads and at six-month follow-up, 84% and 50%, respectively. FEPF improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.628). The King's Health Questionnaire demonstrated significant improvement in both groups and in all domains. The GPR group presented higher adherence to treatment, with no dropouts. CONCLUSIONS: GPR could represent an alternative method to treat stress urinary incontinence in women, should the results be long lasting.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Global Postural Re-education (GPR) on stress urinary incontinence symptoms and to compare it to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT). STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-two women with stress urinary incontinence were distributed into two groups: Group 1 (G1) was submitted to weekly sessions of GPR for three months and Group 2 (G2) performed Pelvic Floor Muscle Training four times a week for three months. Patients were evaluated through the King's Health Questionnaire, a three-day voiding diary including daily pad use and a Functional Evaluation of the Pelvic Floor (FEPF), before treatment (T0), at the end of treatment (T1) and six months after treatment (T2). RESULTS: The number of leaking episodes dropped significantly in both groups at the end of treatment and at six months follow-up, with a significantly greater decrease in G1. Daily pad use dropped significantly in both groups. At the end of treatment, 72% of the patients in G1 and 41% of the patients in G2 needed no pads and at six-month follow-up, 84% and 50%, respectively. FEPF improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.628). The King's Health Questionnaire demonstrated significant improvement in both groups and in all domains. The GPR group presented higher adherence to treatment, with no dropouts. CONCLUSIONS: GPR could represent an alternative method to treat stress urinary incontinence in women, should the results be long lasting.
Authors: Celina Fozzatti; Cassio Riccetto; Viviane Herrmann; Maria Fernanda Brancalion; Marina Raimondi; Caio H Nascif; Luiza R Marques; Paulo P Palma Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Ali Borazjani; Helina Tadesse; Fekade Ayenachew; Howard B Goldman; Margot S Damaser; L Lewis Wall Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: David Merinero; Manuel Rodríguez-Aragón; Javier Álvarez-González; Álvaro López-Samanes; Joaquín López-Pascual Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Laura Fuentes-Aparicio; Mercè Balasch-Bernat; Laura López-Bueno Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Laura Fuentes-Aparicio; Beatriz Arranz-Martín; Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Javier Bailón-Cerezo; Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hongmei Zhu; Di Zhang; Lei Gao; Huixin Liu; Yonghui Di; Bing Xie; Wei Jiao; Xiuli Sun Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-04 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Lei Gao; Di Zhang; Shiyan Wang; Yuanyuan Jia; Haibo Wang; Xiuli Sun; Jianliu Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 3.390