Literature DB >> 20638134

Redox-active complexes formed during the interaction between glutathione and mercury and/or copper ions.

Margarita E Aliaga1, Camilo López-Alarcón, Germán Barriga, Claudio Olea-Azar, Hernán Speisky.   

Abstract

Prompted by the recently reported capacity of the physiologically occurring Cu(I)-[glutathione](2) complex (Cu(I)-[GSH)](2)) to reduce oxygen, the effect of various GSH-binding metals (Co(2+), Cd(2+), Zn(2+), Pb(2+), Al(3+), Hg(2+) and Ni(2+)) on the superoxide-generating capacity of such complex was investigated. Amongst all tested metals, only Hg(2+) was able to substantially affect the capacity of Cu(I)-[GSH](2) to generate superoxide. When Hg(2+) and Cu(I)-[GSH](2) were mixed equimolarly, the superoxide formation, assessed through the cytochrome c reduction and dihydroethidium oxidation, was increased by over 50%. Such effect was totally inhibitable by SOD. Based on the reportedly higher affinity of Hg(2+) for GSH and the observed ability of Hg(2+) to lower the concentration of Cu(I)-[GSH](2) (spectroscopically assessed), we suggest that Hg(2+) displaces Cu(I) from Cu(I)-[GSH](2), to release Cu(I) ions and form a Hg(II)-[GSH](2) complex. The latter species would account for the Hg(2+)-induced exacerbation of the superoxide production. In fact, the present study provides first time evidence that a preformed Hg(II)-[GSH](2) complex is able to concentration-dependently reduce oxygen. Such redox-activity was evidenced using cytochrome c and confirmed by EPR studies using DMPO (5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide, a spin-trapping agent). Considering this novel ability of Hg(II)-[GSH](2) to generate superoxide, a further characterization of its redox-activity and its potential to affect superoxide-susceptible biological targets appears warranted. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20638134     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2010.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inorg Biochem        ISSN: 0162-0134            Impact factor:   4.155


  5 in total

1.  Sulfhydryl groups as targets of mercury toxicity.

Authors:  Olga P Ajsuvakova; Alexey A Tinkov; Michael Aschner; João B T Rocha; Bernhard Michalke; Margarita G Skalnaya; Anatoly V Skalny; Monica Butnariu; Maryam Dadar; Ioan Sarac; Jan Aaseth; Geir Bjørklund
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 22.315

2.  The effects of prenatal methylmercury exposure on trace element and antioxidant levels in rats following 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neuronal insult.

Authors:  Zulfiah Mohamed Moosa; Willie M U Daniels; Musa V Mabandla
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 3.  Non-redox cycling mechanisms of oxidative stress induced by PM metals.

Authors:  James M Samet; Hao Chen; Edward R Pennington; Philip A Bromberg
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 4.  Ferroptosis as a mechanism of non-ferrous metal toxicity.

Authors:  Michael Aschner; Alexey A Tinkov; Anatoly V Skalny; Airton C Martins; Anton I Sinitskii; Marcelo Farina; Rongzhu Lu; Fernando Barbosa; Yordanka G Gluhcheva; Abel Santamaria
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.168

5.  Dithiophosphate-Induced Redox Conversions of Reduced and Oxidized Glutathione.

Authors:  Rezeda A Ishkaeva; Ilyas S Nizamov; Dmitriy S Blokhin; Elizaveta A Urakova; Vladimir V Klochkov; Ilnar D Nizamov; Bulat I Gareev; Diana V Salakhieva; Timur I Abdullin
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.