Literature DB >> 20637960

Effects of glatiramer acetate on spasticity in previously interferon-beta-treated and treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, uncontrolled, observational pilot study.

José Eustasio Meca-Lallana1, Pedro de Mingo-Casado, Manuel Amorin-Díaz, María Luisa Martínez-Navarro, Andrés Fernández Barreiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment with interferon-beta (IFN-beta) has been related to worsening of muscle spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, there are no specific data on the effects of glatiramer acetate (GA) on spasticity.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of GA on spasticity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had been previously treated with IFN-beta or were treatment naive.
METHODS: Two cohorts of MS patients with spasticity who were about to begin treatment with GA at the approved dosage (20 mg/d) were enrolled in the study: patients who were being switched from IFN-beta due to adverse events or lack of efficacy (cohort 1) and patients who were treatment naive (cohort 2). The follow-up periods for cohorts 1 and 2 were 18 and 12 months, respectively. Patients' physical condition was assessed at baseline and at the end of follow-up using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS), Global Pain Score (GPS), Adductor Tone Rating Scale, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and neurophysiologic tests (latency and amplitude of the Hoffmann reflex [H reflex] in the soleus, and ratio of maximum H reflex to maximum motor response [H/M ratio] in the lower limb). The frequency and severity of adverse events were recorded throughout follow-up, and investigators rated the causal relationship to GA (unrelated, unlikely, possibly, or probably).
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included in the study, 13 in cohort 1 and 15 in cohort 2. All patients were white. Cohort 1 was 76.9% female, with a mean (SD) age of 39.85 (9.25) years; cohort 2 was 66.7% female, with a mean age of 40.73 (11.52) years. Cohort 1 had significant reductions from baseline to the end of follow-up in mean scores on the MAS for the right hemibody (from 1.85 [0.61] to 1.18 [0.60]; P = 0.002) and left hemibody (from 1.86 [0.55] to 1.27 [0.65]; P = 0.045), PSFS (from 2.00 [0.91] to 0.36 [0.81]; P = 0.002), and GPS (from 47.69 [13.94] to 24.09 [17.15] mm; P = 0.002). The changes from baseline were not significant on the mean Adductor Tone Rating Scale, EDSS, H-reflex latency or amplitude on either side, or lower-limb H/M ratio on either side. Cohort 2 had significant reductions from baseline in H-reflex latency on the left side (from 30.31 [2.44] to 28.75 [2.01]; P = 0.005) and H/M ratio on the right side (from 0.45 [0.15] to 0.35 [0.19]; P = 0.025). There were no significant changes in mean scores on the MAS for either hemibody, PSFS, GPS, Adductor Tone Rating Scale, EDSS, H-reflex latency on the right side, H-reflex amplitude on either side, or lower-limb H/M ratio on the left side. Sixteen patients experienced a total of 28 adverse events. Seven mild adverse events were considered related to GA: local reaction at the injection site (3 patients); headache/migraine, anxiety, and skin reaction (1 patient each); and an unspecified adverse drug reaction (1 patient). Two serious adverse events (pyelonephritis and pyrexia) occurred during the study, neither of them considered related to GA.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, GA treatment did not increase spasticity. Furthermore, the results suggest that GA may reduce spasticity in patients previously treated with IFN-beta. These findings support the conduct of large randomized controlled trials of the effects of GA on spasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20637960     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Aaron Boster; Mary Pat Bartoszek; Colleen O'Connell; David Pitt; Michael Racke
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 2.  Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and in delaying the onset of clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Clinical utility of glatiramer acetate in the management of relapse frequency in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Oscar Fernández
Journal:  J Cent Nerv Syst Dis       Date:  2012-08-29

4.  Bioactivity determination of native and variant forms of therapeutic interferons.

Authors:  Louise Larocque; Alex Bliu; Ranran Xu; Abebaw Diress; Junzhi Wang; Rongtuan Lin; Runtao He; Michel Girard; Xuguang Li
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-03

Review 5.  Development of oral immunomodulatory agents in the management of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard Nicholas; Paolo Giannetti; Ali Alsanousi; Tim Friede; Paolo A Muraro
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Cost analysis of glatiramer acetate versus interferon-β for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in patients with spasticity: the Escala study.

Authors:  Rainel Sánchez-de la Rosa; Laura García-Bujalance; José Meca-Lallana
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-10-16

Review 7.  Spasticity in multiple sclerosis and role of glatiramer acetate treatment.

Authors:  Jose Eustasio Meca-Lallana; Rocío Hernández-Clares; Ester Carreón-Guarnizo
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.