OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the incidence of luteinizing hormone (LH) rise is reduced by using a flexible compared with a fixed day-6 protocol of GnRH antagonist administration. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (n = 146). INTERVENTION(S): Ovarian stimulation was performed using recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (0.25 mg/d) was started either on day 6 of stimulation (fixed group) or when LH was >10 IU/L, and/or a follicle with mean diameter >12 mm was present, and/or serum E(2) was >150 pg/mL. Patient monitoring was initiated on day 3 of stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of LH rise. RESULT(S): No statistically significant difference was observed between the flexible and fixed groups regarding the incidence of LH rise, which was lower in the flexible group (11.0% vs. 15.1%, difference -4.1%, 95% confidence interval -15.4% to +7.1%). No LH surges were observed in any of the patients studied. CONCLUSION(S): Flexible antagonist administration from day 3 onward does not appear to reduce the incidence of LH rises compared with fixed antagonist administration on day 6 of stimulation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the incidence of luteinizing hormone (LH) rise is reduced by using a flexible compared with a fixed day-6 protocol of GnRH antagonist administration. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (n = 146). INTERVENTION(S): Ovarian stimulation was performed using recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (0.25 mg/d) was started either on day 6 of stimulation (fixed group) or when LH was >10 IU/L, and/or a follicle with mean diameter >12 mm was present, and/or serum E(2) was >150 pg/mL. Patient monitoring was initiated on day 3 of stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of LH rise. RESULT(S): No statistically significant difference was observed between the flexible and fixed groups regarding the incidence of LH rise, which was lower in the flexible group (11.0% vs. 15.1%, difference -4.1%, 95% confidence interval -15.4% to +7.1%). No LH surges were observed in any of the patients studied. CONCLUSION(S): Flexible antagonist administration from day 3 onward does not appear to reduce the incidence of LH rises compared with fixed antagonist administration on day 6 of stimulation.