Literature DB >> 20637210

Social network structure and parasite infection patterns in a territorial reptile, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus).

Stephanie S Godfrey1, Jennifer A Moore, Nicola J Nelson, C Michael Bull.   

Abstract

We investigated whether the parasite load of an individual could be predicted by its position in a social network. Specifically, we derived social networks in a solitary, territorial reptile (the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus), with links based on the sharing of space, not necessarily synchronously, in overlapping territories. Tuatara are infected by ectoparasitic ticks (Amblyomma sphenodonti), mites (Neotrombicula spp.) and a blood parasite (Hepatozoon tuatarae) which is transmitted by the tick. We recorded the location of individual tuatara in two study plots twice daily during the mating season (March) in 2years (2006 and 2007) on Stephens Island, New Zealand. We constructed weighted, directed networks to represent pathways for parasite transmission, where nodes represented individual tuatara and edges connecting the nodes represented the extent of territory overlap among each pair of individuals. We considered a network-based hypothesis which predicted that the in-strength of individuals (the sum of edge weights directed towards a node) in the derived network would be positively related to their parasite load. Alternatively, if the derived social network did not reflect actual parasite transmission, we predicted other factors such as host sex, size or territory size may better explain variation in parasite infection patterns. We found clear positive relationships between the in-strength of tuatara and their tick loads, and infection patterns with tick-borne blood parasites. In particular, the extent that individuals were connected to males in the network consistently predicted tick loads of tuatara. However, mite loads of tuatara were significantly related to host sex, body size and territory size, and showed little association with network measures. The results suggest that the pathway of transmission of parasites through a population will depend on the transmission mechanism of the parasite, but that social networks provide a powerful predictive tool for some parasites.
Copyright © 2010 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20637210     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  13 in total

1.  Brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus): a model for differentiating the role of social networks and physical contact on parasite transmission dynamics.

Authors:  Rebecca Rimbach; Donal Bisanzio; Nelson Galvis; Andrés Link; Anthony Di Fiore; Thomas R Gillespie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Contact and contagion: Probability of transmission given contact varies with demographic state in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Kezia R Manlove; E Frances Cassirer; Raina K Plowright; Paul C Cross; Peter J Hudson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Evaluating empirical contact networks as potential transmission pathways for infectious diseases.

Authors:  Kimberly VanderWaal; Eva A Enns; Catalina Picasso; Craig Packer; Meggan E Craft
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Primate reinfection with gastrointestinal parasites: behavioural and physiological predictors of parasite acquisition.

Authors:  Sagan Friant; Toni E Ziegler; Tony L Goldberg
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Affiliation and disease risk: social networks mediate gut microbial transmission among rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Krishna N Balasubramaniam; Brianne A Beisner; Josephine A Hubbard; Jessica J Vandeleest; Edward R Atwill; Brenda McCowan
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Trade-offs with telemetry-derived contact networks for infectious disease studies in wildlife.

Authors:  Marie L J Gilbertson; Lauren A White; Meggan E Craft
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 7.781

7.  The effects of demographic, social, and environmental characteristics on pathogen prevalence in wild felids across a gradient of urbanization.

Authors:  Jesse S Lewis; Kenneth A Logan; Mat W Alldredge; Scott Carver; Sarah N Bevins; Michael Lappin; Sue VandeWoude; Kevin R Crooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Monkeys in the middle: parasite transmission through the social network of a wild primate.

Authors:  Andrew J J MacIntosh; Armand Jacobs; Cécile Garcia; Keiko Shimizu; Keiko Mouri; Michael A Huffman; Alexander D Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: A framework for wildlife parasitology.

Authors:  Stephanie S Godfrey
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.674

10.  Testing the robustness of transmission network models to predict ectoparasite loads. One lizard, two ticks and four years.

Authors:  Caroline K Wohlfiel; Stephan T Leu; Stephanie S Godfrey; C Michael Bull
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.674

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.