AIMS: To assess interobserver variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus, especially indefinite dysplasia (IND) using the revised Vienna classification. A secondary aim was to study clinical outcome of IND cases and to evaluate expression of alpha-methyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) as a marker predictive of progression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cases of Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia over a 20 year period were assessed. Three experienced histopathologists reviewed 101 cases on set criteria in a blinded fashion. Slides were immunostained for AMACR and evaluated for the presence, extent and location of AMACR expression. Clinical and progression data were collected. Overall agreement for the diagnosis of dysplasia was fair (k = 0.35) but that for IND was poor (k = 0.18). 6 IND cases progressed after a median follow-up of 31.4 months to a higher grade. The sensitivity of AMACR for the detection of abnormality was 22% for IND and specificity 100%. The positive predictive value of AMACR for progression was 0.44 and the negative predictive value was 0.92. CONCLUSION: Fair agreement was achieved for the diagnosis of dysplasia but poor agreement for IND. A proportion of IND cases progress. Re-diagnosis or consensus diagnosis did not predict progression. AMACR shows promise as a marker to indicate IND patients in need of more intensive surveillance.
AIMS: To assess interobserver variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus, especially indefinite dysplasia (IND) using the revised Vienna classification. A secondary aim was to study clinical outcome of IND cases and to evaluate expression of alpha-methyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) as a marker predictive of progression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cases of Barrett's oesophagus and dysplasia over a 20 year period were assessed. Three experienced histopathologists reviewed 101 cases on set criteria in a blinded fashion. Slides were immunostained for AMACR and evaluated for the presence, extent and location of AMACR expression. Clinical and progression data were collected. Overall agreement for the diagnosis of dysplasia was fair (k = 0.35) but that for IND was poor (k = 0.18). 6 IND cases progressed after a median follow-up of 31.4 months to a higher grade. The sensitivity of AMACR for the detection of abnormality was 22% for IND and specificity 100%. The positive predictive value of AMACR for progression was 0.44 and the negative predictive value was 0.92. CONCLUSION: Fair agreement was achieved for the diagnosis of dysplasia but poor agreement for IND. A proportion of IND cases progress. Re-diagnosis or consensus diagnosis did not predict progression. AMACR shows promise as a marker to indicate INDpatients in need of more intensive surveillance.
Authors: Nikhil A Sangle; Shari L Taylor; Mary J Emond; Michelle Depot; Bergein F Overholt; Mary P Bronner Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Prashanthi N Thota; Gaurav Kistangari; Ashwini K Esnakula; David Hernandez Gonzalo; Xiu-Li Liu Journal: World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-08-06
Authors: Zhao-Xiu Liu; Xiu-Li Liu; Deepa T Patil; Lei Lian; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; Run-Zhou Ni; Bo Shen Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Mamoun Younes; Keith Brown; Gregory Y Lauwers; Gulchin Ergun; Frank Meriano; A Carl Schmulen; Alberto Barroso; Atilla Ertan Journal: Histopathology Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Matthew D Stachler; Nicholas D Camarda; Christopher Deitrick; Anthony Kim; Agoston T Agoston; Robert D Odze; Jason L Hornick; Anwesha Nag; Aaron R Thorner; Matthew Ducar; Amy Noffsinger; Richard H Lash; Mark Redston; Scott L Carter; Jon M Davison; Adam J Bass Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-03-31 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Cathy Bennett; Paul Moayyedi; Douglas A Corley; John DeCaestecker; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Gary Falk; Nimish Vakil; Scott Sanders; Michael Vieth; John Inadomi; David Aldulaimi; Khek-Yu Ho; Robert Odze; Stephen J Meltzer; Eamonn Quigley; Stuart Gittens; Peter Watson; Giovanni Zaninotto; Prasad G Iyer; Leo Alexandre; Yeng Ang; James Callaghan; Rebecca Harrison; Rajvinder Singh; Pradeep Bhandari; Raf Bisschops; Bita Geramizadeh; Philip Kaye; Sheila Krishnadath; M Brian Fennerty; Hendrik Manner; Katie S Nason; Oliver Pech; Vani Konda; Krish Ragunath; Imdadur Rahman; Yvonne Romero; Richard Sampliner; Peter D Siersema; Jan Tack; Tony C K Tham; Nigel Trudgill; David S Weinberg; Jean Wang; Kenneth Wang; Jennie Y Y Wong; Stephen Attwood; Peter Malfertheiner; David MacDonald; Hugh Barr; Mark K Ferguson; Janusz Jankowski Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 10.864