Literature DB >> 20636586

Medical students' professional identity development in an early nursing attachment.

Esther Helmich1, Els Derksen, Mathieu Prevoo, Roland Laan, Sanneke Bolhuis, Raymond Koopmans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The importance of early clinical experience for medical training is well documented. However, to our knowledge there are no studies that assess the influence of very early nursing attachments on the professional development and identity construction of medical students. Working as an assistant nurse while training to be a doctor may offer valuable learning experiences, but may also present the student with difficulties with respect to identity and identification issues. The aim of the present study was to describe first-year medical students' perceptions of nurses, doctors and their own future roles as doctors before and after a nursing attachment.
METHODS: A questionnaire containing open questions concerning students' perceptions of nurses, doctors and their own future roles as doctors was administered to all Year 1 medical students (n=347) before and directly after a 4-week nursing attachment in hospitals and nursing homes. We carried out two confirmatory focus group interviews. We analysed the data using qualitative and quantitative content analyses.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 316 students (response rate 91%). Before starting the attachment students regarded nurses as empathic, communicative and responsible. After the attachment students reported nurses had more competencies and responsibilities than they had expected. Students' views of doctors were ambivalent. Before and after the attachment, doctors were seen as interested and reliable, but also as arrogant, detached and insensible. However, students maintained positive views of their own future roles as doctors. Students' perceptions were influenced by age, gender and place of attachment.
CONCLUSIONS: An early nursing attachment engenders more respect for the nursing profession. The ambivalent view of doctors needs to be explored further in relation to students' professional development. It would seem relevant to attune supervision to the age and gender differences revealed in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20636586     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03710.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

1.  Exploring the tensions of being and becoming a medical educator.

Authors:  Ahsan Sethi; Rola Ajjawi; Sean McAleer; Susie Schofield
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  A clinical nursing rotation transforms medical students' interprofessional attitudes.

Authors:  Katrina Butterworth; Rashmi Rajupadhya; Rajesh Gongal; Terra Manca; Shelley Ross; Darren Nichols
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  "I didn't realise they had such a key role." Impact of medical education curriculum change on medical student interactions with nurses: a qualitative exploratory study of student perceptions.

Authors:  Ray Samuriwo; Elinor Laws; Katie Webb; Alison Bullock
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Practice-based learning: an appropriate means to acquire the attitude and skills for evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Tamara E T van Woezik; Jurriaan P Oosterman; Rob P B Reuzel; Gert-Jan van der Wilt; Jur J Koksma
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-07-24

5.  How pharmacy and medicine students experience the power differential between professions: "Even if the pharmacist knows better, the doctor's decision goes".

Authors:  Josephine Thomas; Koshila Kumar; Anna Chur-Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Identity construction in medical student stories about experiences of disgust in early nursing home placements: a dialogical narrative analysis.

Authors:  Sally Warmington; May-Lill Johansen; Hamish Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.