Literature DB >> 20636583

Making sense of differences between medical schools through Bourdieu's concept of 'field'.

Caragh Brosnan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Most basic medical education studies focus on one medical school, and the social and educational significance of differences between schools remains poorly understood. Sociologists have called for more comparative studies and for research on the institutional context of medical education. This paper introduces Bourdieu's concept of 'field' as a tool for conducting such analyses. CONTEXT: A 'field' is any arena in which there is a struggle over resources (capital), akin to a 'game' between players who occupy different positions depending on the resources they have. Prior studies show that higher education institutions compete in a field for various forms of capital which are reflected in their curricula and the students they attract.
METHODS: This paper argues that medical education can be conceptualised as a field within which medical schools compete for different forms of capital, such as students, funding and prestige. The structure of the UK medical education field is analysed as a specific example of how Bourdieu's framework can be applied. It is argued that UK medical schools' varying curricula and admissions criteria serve to distinguish them from their competitors and to facilitate access to different forms of capital. Competition within the field helps to maintain inter-school differences, with implications for both curriculum reform and students' beliefs and aspirations.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools have varying curricula, reputations, and types and levels of resources. They compete with one another on all these fronts and attract different types of students and staff. Research and practice in basic medical education must take account of the position of any given medical school in relation to its competitors and to external agencies in order to critically consider the ethos of its curriculum and the perspectives of its students and staff. Bourdieu's concept of field offers one useful way of accomplishing this.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20636583     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03680.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  9 in total

1.  Limits of medical research - some considerations.

Authors:  Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Boundaries, gaps, and overlaps: defining roles in a multidisciplinary nephrology clinic.

Authors:  Terese Stenfors-Hayes; Helen H Kang
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-10-09

3.  Understanding the relation between medical students' collective and individual trajectories: an application of habitus.

Authors:  Dorene F Balmer; Michael J Devlin; Boyd F Richards
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-02

4.  Making theory explicit - An analysis of how medical education research(ers) describe how they connect to theory.

Authors:  Klara Bolander Laksov; Tim Dornan; Pim W Teunissen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Building successful and sustainable academic health science partnerships: exploring perspectives of hospital leaders.

Authors:  Sarah DeBoer; Jamie Dockx; Chris Lam; Shabdit Shah; Gillian Young; Martine Quesnel; Stella Ng; Brenda Mori
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2019-03-13

6.  Taking horse to the pond: Applying Bourdieu's concepts in undergraduate student research.

Authors:  V Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

7.  Sociological analysis of the medical field: using Bourdieu to understand the processes preceding medical doctors' specialty choice and the influence of perceived status and other forms of symbolic capital on their choices.

Authors:  Caroline Olsson; S Kalén; S Ponzer
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.853

8.  Using Bourdieu to explore graduate attributes in two online Master's programmes.

Authors:  Gillian Aitken; Derek Jones; Tim Fawns; Douglas Sutherland; Sarah Henderson
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  A survey of factors influencing career preference in new-entrant and exiting medical students from four UK medical schools.

Authors:  Jennifer A Cleland; Peter W Johnston; Micheal Anthony; Nadir Khan; Neil W Scott
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.