Literature DB >> 20636311

Right ventricular septal pacing: a comparative study of outflow tract and mid ventricular sites.

Raphael Rosso1, Caroline Medi, Andrew W Teh, Thuy To Hung, Alexander Feldman, Geoffrey Lee, Harry G Mond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. Alternative RV pacing sites with a narrower QRS compared to RV pacing might reflect a more physiological and synchronous LV activation. The purpose of this study was to compare the QRS morphology, duration, and suitability of RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal and mid-RV septal pacing.
METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients with indication for dual-chamber pacing were enrolled in the study. Two standard 58-cm active fixation leads were passed to the RV and positioned in the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum using a commercially available septal stylet (model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters were compared at the two sites. The RV lead with less-satisfactory electrical parameters was withdrawn and deployed in the right atrium.
RESULTS: Successful positioning of the pacing leads at the RVOT septum and mid-RV septum was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites. The QRS duration in the RVOT septum was 151 ± 14 ms and in the mid-RV septum 145 ± 13 ms (P = 0.150).
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective observational study shows that septal pacing can be reliably achieved both in the RVOT and mid-RV with active fixation leads using a specifically shaped stylet. There are no preferences in regard to acute lead performance or paced QRS duration with either position. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20636311     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02836.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Combining current of injury and P-wave sensing optimized right atrial active-fixation leads implantation.

Authors:  Meng-Rong Chen; Fei-Long Zhang; Wei-Wei Wang; Xue-Hai Chen; Jian-Hua Chen; Liang-Long Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing.

Authors:  Cao Zou; Jianping Song; Hui Li; Xingmei Huang; Yuping Liu; Caiming Zhao; Xin Shi; Xiangjun Yang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Permanent pacemaker implanted into patient's left ventricle via subclavian artery by mistake: a case report.

Authors:  Guanmin Tang; Changlin Zhai; Zhiyong Wang; Hao Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Medium-term effects of septal and apical pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients: a double-blind prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Luis Molina; Richard Sutton; William Gandoy; Nicolás Reyes; Susano Lara; Froylán Limón; Susana Gómez; Consuelo Orihuela; Latife Salame; Gabriela Moreno
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 5.  Ventricular pacing - Electromechanical consequences and valvular function.

Authors:  Elisa Ebrille; Christopher V DeSimone; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Anwar A Chahal; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-03-04

6.  Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.

Authors:  Teng Li; Qiong Xu; Hong-Tao Liao; Dimitrios Asvestas; Konstantinos P Letsas; Yifu Li
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  A randomized comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for implanting pacemaker lead on the right ventricular outflow tract septum.

Authors:  Dongli Chen; Huiqiang Wei; Jiaojiao Tang; Lie Liu; Shulin Wu; Chunying Lin; Qianhuan Zhang; Yuanhong Liang; Silin Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.