Literature DB >> 20636296

The emotional startle effect is disrupted by a concurrent working memory task.

Rosemary King1, Alexandre Schaefer1.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) processes are often thought to play an important role in the cognitive regulation of negative emotions. However, little is known about how they influence emotional processing. We report two experiments that tested whether a concurrent working memory task could modulate the emotional startle eyeblink effect, a well-known index of emotional processing. In both experiments, emotionally negative and neutral pictures were viewed in two conditions: a "cognitive load" (CL) condition, in which participants had to actively maintain information in working memory (WM) while viewing the pictures, and a control "no load" (NL) condition. Picture-viewing instructions were identical across CL and NL. In both experiments, results showed a significant reduction of the emotional modulation of the startle eyeblink reflex in the CL condition compared to the NL condition. These findings suggest that a concurrent WM task disrupts emotional processing even when participants are directing visual focus on emotionally relevant information.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Cognitive control; Emotion; Startle; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20636296     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01062.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  19 in total

1.  Working memory maintenance is sufficient to reduce state anxiety.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; David Quispe-Escudero; Elizabeth Hale; Andrew Davis; Katherine O'Connell; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The effects of methylphenidate and propranolol on the interplay between induced-anxiety and working memory.

Authors:  Monique Ernst; Tiffany Lago; Andrew Davis; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Visual complexity attenuates emotional processing in psychopathy: implications for fear-potentiated startle deficits.

Authors:  Naomi Sadeh; Edelyn Verona
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Describing the interplay between anxiety and cognition: from impaired performance under low cognitive load to reduced anxiety under high load.

Authors:  Katherine Vytal; Brian Cornwell; Nicole Arkin; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  The effects of cognitive load on attention control in subclinical anxiety and generalised anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Sadia Najmi; Nader Amir; Kristen E Frosio; Catherine Ayers
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-10-30

6.  A startling absence of emotion effects: Active attention to the startle probe as a motor task cue appears to eliminate modulation of the startle reflex by valence and arousal.

Authors:  Georgia Panayiotou; Charlotte van Oyen Witvliet; Jason D Robinson; Scott R Vrana
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Brain potentials to emotional pictures are modulated by alexithymia during emotion regulation.

Authors:  Sarah Walker; Daryl B O'Connor; Alexandre Schaefer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Meta-analytic evidence for downregulation of the amygdala during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Lycia D de Voogd; Erno J Hermans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 9.  Memory Reconsolidation Interference as an Emerging Treatment for Emotional Disorders: Strengths, Limitations, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Tom Beckers; Merel Kindt
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 18.561

10.  Affective attention under cognitive load: reduced emotional biases but emergent anxiety-related costs to inhibitory control.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Anne Richards; Joseph Taylor; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.