Literature DB >> 20636243

A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.

Olimpio B Moraes Filho1, Rivaldo M Albuquerque, José G Cecatti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness and safety of 25 microg vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnant women with unripe cervices.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: A public maternity in Recife, Brazil. SAMPLE: A total of 240 pregnant women.
METHODS: Women with a term or post-term, live, singleton fetus in cephalic presentation, intact membranes, Bishop score <6, not in labor, medically indicated for labor induction. They were randomly divided in Group 1, where 119 women received 25 microg of intravaginal misoprostol every 6 hours for a maximum of four doses; and Group 2, where 121 women had a 14-F Foley catheter inserted into their cervical canal. Once past the internal os, the balloon was inflated. Intravenous oxytocin was initiated after the balloon was spontaneously extruded from the cervix or after 24 hours.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding baseline characteristics. Misoprostol was more effective in inducing labor than Foley catheter and oxytocin. Mean induction-to-vaginal delivery time with misoprostol was shorter (17.3 vs. 20.2 hours, p = 0.016). There were more vaginal deliveries in the misoprostol group at 12 (p < 0.001) and 18 (p = 0.007) hours, but the difference was no longer statistically significant at 24 and 48 hours. There were no significant differences in uterine contraction abnormalities, puerperal infection or neonatal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal misoprostol is more effective than and as safe as Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor in term and post-term pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20636243     DOI: 10.3109/00016349.2010.499447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Progress of labor in women induced with misoprostol versus the Foley catheter.

Authors:  Methodius G Tuuli; Mary B Keegan; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly Roehl; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios.

Authors:  G Shechter-Maor; G Haran; D Sadeh-Mestechkin; Y Ganor-Paz; M D Fejgin; T Biron-Shental
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen L Mozurkewich; Julie L Chilimigras; Deborah R Berman; Uma C Perni; Vivian C Romero; Valerie J King; Kristie L Keeton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

5.  Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction.

Authors:  Nasreen Noor; Mehkat Ansari; S Manazir Ali; Shazia Parveen
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-10-18

6.  Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Sedigheh Ayati; Elahe Hasanzadeh; Leila Pourali; Mohammadtaghi Shakeri; Atiye Vatanchi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-07-31

7.  Double balloon catheters: A promising tool for induction of labor in multiparous women with unfavorable cervices

Authors:  Fırat Tülek; Ali Gemici; Feride Söylemez
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-09-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.