Literature DB >> 20635854

Prediction of neurological deficits and recovery after surgery in the supplementary motor area: a prospective study in 26 patients.

Keren Rosenberg1, Erez Nossek, Ronit Liebling, Itzhak Fried, Irit Shapira-Lichter, Talma Hendler, Zvi Ram.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Resection of lesions involving the supplementary motor area (SMA) may result in immediate postoperative motor and speech deficits that are reversible in most cases. In the present study the authors aimed to determine the critical involvement of SMA in the lesioned and healthy hemispheres in this functional recovery. They hypothesized that compensatory mechanisms take place following surgery in the SMA, and that these mechanisms can involve either the lesioned or the non-lesioned hemisphere. In addition, they hypothesized that a correlation will be present between the functional MR imaging (fMR) imaging-related activation in the SMA and the occurrence of a functional deficit during intraoperative cortical stimulation.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients scheduled for resection of space-occupying lesions involving, or in the vicinity of, the SMA were recruited. Patients underwent an fMR imaging examination that included finger-tapping and verb-generation tests to assess for motor and language functions. Intraoperatively direct cortical stimulation (DCS) of the SMA region was performed while patients were monitored for language and motor functions using tests similar to those used for the fMR imaging. Task dysfunction during DCS assessed the critical involvement of the SMA in the tested functions. Neurological evaluations were performed prior to surgery and at 3 time points within a month following surgery. A region of interest-based approach was used to evaluate fMR imaging blood oxygen level-dependent activation level and asymmetry in the SMA. These measurements were later compared with the intraoperative DCS and neurological findings.
RESULTS: Functional MR imaging showed greater activation and dominance of the SMA in the lesioned hemisphere in patients who exhibited no motor or language dysfunction during DCS. In addition, patients with the highest activation of the SMA in the lesioned hemisphere for language and motor tests showed stronger coupling of this region with ipsilateral motor and language networks. In contrast, activation in the nonlesioned hemisphere did not correspond with DCS results.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings demonstrate the necessity of activation in the vicinity of the lesioned SMA for functional compensation in motor and language tasks. It is possible that more effective functional coupling of the SMA with motor and language areas in the same hemisphere prevents dysfunctions following surgical intervention. Importantly, fMR imaging activation in the unaffected SMA was not sufficient for development of functional compensation and, if anything, indicated decompensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20635854     DOI: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  18 in total

1.  Essential Subcortical Tracts in Language and Reading. 3D-Tractography for Clinical Practice and Anatomic Correlation with Intraoperative Subcortical Electrostimulation.

Authors:  M M Jiménez-Peña; S Gil-Robles; R Cano-Alonso; M Recio-Rodríguez; J Carrascoso-Arranz; C Ruiz-Ocaña; V Martínez-Vega
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Postoperative supplementary motor area syndrome: clinical evolution and prognosis in nine patients after left hemispheric tumor resection.

Authors:  T Shamov; J Al-Hashel; R T Rousseff
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 3.  A contemporary framework of language processing in the human brain in the context of preoperative and intraoperative language mapping.

Authors:  Erik H Middlebrooks; Kaan Yagmurlu; Jerzey P Szaflarski; Maryam Rahman; Baran Bozkurt
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Aborting a neurosurgical procedure: analyzing the decision factors, with endoscopic third ventriculostomy as a model.

Authors:  Jonathan Roth; Shlomi Constantini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Postoperative isolated lower extremity supplementary motor area syndrome: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Nardin Samuel; Brian Hanak; Jerry Ku; Ali Moghaddamjou; Francois Mathieu; Mahendra Moharir; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Recurrent Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome Following Repeat Brain Tumor Resection Involving Supplementary Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Taylor J Abel; Robert T Buckley; Ryan P Morton; Patrik Gabikian; Daniel L Silbergeld
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Structure and function of corticospinal projection originating from supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Xu; Peng Lin; Pei-Sen Yao; Shu-Fa Zheng; De-Zhi Kang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Language Mapping Using fMRI and Direct Cortical Stimulation for Brain Tumor Surgery: The Good, the Bad, and the Questionable.

Authors:  Nicole Petrovich Brennan; Kyung K Peck; Andrei Holodny
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02

Review 9.  The supplementary motor area syndrome: a neurosurgical review.

Authors:  Harry Pinson; Jeroen Van Lerbeirghe; Dimitri Vanhauwaert; Olivier Van Damme; Giorgio Hallaert; Jean-Pierre Kalala
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Functional localization of the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Satoru Hiroshima; Ryogo Anei; Noboru Murakami; Kyousuke Kamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.