AIM: Several organizations consider mother's milk the optimal nutrition source for newborns [AAP, 1998; Gartner et al., 1997; Mohrbacher and Stock, 2002; WHO, 1989]. However, there is little scientific evidence supporting the idea that breastfeeding has a positive influence on the development of the orofacial structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study of cases and controls (observational, analytical and retrospective) and lateral teleradiographs of the cranium of 197 patients (106 breast-fed and 91 bottle-fed) were compared. Ricketts, Steiner and McNamara values were used for the cephalometric analysis. Differences between the two groups were analysed by applying the T-test and ANOVA. Statistical significance levels were set at p<0.05. Non-nutritive infantile sucking habits have been compared; differences between the two groups were analysed by applying the Chi-square test. RESULTS: First, the upper incisors were found to be protruded in the bottle-fed group. Second, subjects belonging to the breast-fed group displayed a brachycephalic mandible arch, while those fed with bottle had a dolichocephalic Steiner mandibular plane. Third, both facial depth and distance of the pogonion to the perpendicular nasion presented a certain tendency to a retruded mandibular bone in the bottle-fed group. And fourth, the frequency of use of dummy and thumb suction were greater in the bottle feed group, without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In addition to the multiple advantages that mother's milk offers to newborns, breastfeeding also helps correct orofacial development (not only for the incisors position, but also for the vertical and sagittal relations of the mandible with upper maxillary and cranial basis).
AIM: Several organizations consider mother's milk the optimal nutrition source for newborns [AAP, 1998; Gartner et al., 1997; Mohrbacher and Stock, 2002; WHO, 1989]. However, there is little scientific evidence supporting the idea that breastfeeding has a positive influence on the development of the orofacial structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study of cases and controls (observational, analytical and retrospective) and lateral teleradiographs of the cranium of 197 patients (106 breast-fed and 91 bottle-fed) were compared. Ricketts, Steiner and McNamara values were used for the cephalometric analysis. Differences between the two groups were analysed by applying the T-test and ANOVA. Statistical significance levels were set at p<0.05. Non-nutritive infantile sucking habits have been compared; differences between the two groups were analysed by applying the Chi-square test. RESULTS: First, the upper incisors were found to be protruded in the bottle-fed group. Second, subjects belonging to the breast-fed group displayed a brachycephalic mandible arch, while those fed with bottle had a dolichocephalic Steiner mandibular plane. Third, both facial depth and distance of the pogonion to the perpendicular nasion presented a certain tendency to a retruded mandibular bone in the bottle-fed group. And fourth, the frequency of use of dummy and thumb suction were greater in the bottle feed group, without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In addition to the multiple advantages that mother's milk offers to newborns, breastfeeding also helps correct orofacial development (not only for the incisors position, but also for the vertical and sagittal relations of the mandible with upper maxillary and cranial basis).
Authors: María Carrillo-Díaz; Ana Ruiz-Guillén; María Moya; Martín Romero-Maroto; María José González-Olmo Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Bronwyn K Brew; Guy B Marks; Catarina Almqvist; Peter A Cistulli; Karen Webb; Nathaniel S Marshall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gabriela Mesquita Lopes-Freire; Abel Belizario Cahuana Cárdenas; José Enrique Espasa Suarez de Deza; Josep Maria Ustrell-Torrent; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Joan Ramon Boj Quesada Journal: Prog Orthod Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.750
Authors: Montserrat Boronat-Catalá; José María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Manuel Almerich-Silla; Montserrat Catalá-Pizarro Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Laura Jackeline Garcia Rincon; Gizelton Pereira Alencar; Marly Augusto Cardoso; Paulo Capel Narvai; Paulo Frazão Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.240