| Literature DB >> 20635406 |
James J Cox1, Jony Sheynin, Zamir Shorer, Frank Reimann, Adeline K Nicholas, Lorena Zubovic, Marco Baralle, Elizabeth Wraige, Esther Manor, Jacov Levy, C Geoffery Woods, Ruti Parvari.
Abstract
SCN9Aencodes the voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.7, a protein highly expressed in pain-sensing neurons. Mutations in SCN9A cause three human pain disorders: bi-allelic loss of function mutations result in Channelopathy-associated Insensitivity to Pain (CIP), whereas activating mutations cause severe episodic pain in Paroxysmal Extreme Pain Disorder (PEPD) and Primary Erythermalgia (PE). To date, all mutations in SCN9A that cause a complete inability to experience pain are protein truncating and presumably lead to no protein being produced. Here, we describe the identification and functional characterization of two novel non-truncating mutations in families with CIP: a homozygously-inherited missense mutation found in a consanguineous Israeli Bedouin family (Na(v)1.7-R896Q) and a five amino acid in-frame deletion found in a sporadic compound heterozygote (Na(v)1.7-DeltaR1370-L1374). Both of these mutations map to the pore region of the Na(v)1.7 sodium channel. Using transient transfection of PC12 cells we found a significant reduction in membrane localization of the mutant protein compared to the wild type. Furthermore, voltage clamp experiments of mutant-transfected HEK293 cells show a complete loss of function of the sodium channel, consistent with the absence of pain phenotype. In summary, this study has identified critical amino acids needed for the normal subcellular localization and function of Na(v)1.7. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20635406 PMCID: PMC2966863 DOI: 10.1002/humu.21325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mutat ISSN: 1059-7794 Impact factor: 4.878
Figure 1Novel mutations identified in SCN9A. (a) Pedigree and haplotype around the SCN9A gene of the Israeli Bedouin family with the Nav1.7-R896Q mutation; (b) Pedigree for British singleton carrying the two mutations Nav1.7-ΔR1370-L1374 and Nav1.7- I1493SfsX8; (c) Schematic representation of the Nav1.7 sodium channel and locations of the identified mutations. The plasma membrane is shown in grey; transmembrane segments are labelled 1-6; the extracellular linkers between transmembrane segments 5 and 6 form the channel pore. Note that the Nav1.7-R896Q and Nav1.7-ΔR1370-L1374 mutations both map to similar regions of the channel in domain (D) 2 and 3 respectively.
Figure 2(a) Immuno staining of PC12 cells expressing the Nav1.7 sodium channel. From left to right the staining is as follows: anti-Nav1.7, anti-pan cadherin, merged image (with DAPI in blue). The WT Nav1.7 shows a faint but distinct 'rim' which colocalizes with the plasma membrane marker pan cadherin. Both the missense (Nav1.7-R896Q) and the in-frame deletion (Nav 1.7-ΔR1370-L 1374) typically do not show this rim effect. For each transfection experiment a representative cell is shown, with the Z slice chosen as the one with the most plasma membrane staining according to the anti-pan cadherin marker. Untransfected cells showed some golgi-localized staining, but never staining at the plasma membrane. (b) For each Nav1.7 construct, at least 300 cells were assessed for plasma membrane staining of Nav1.7. There were significantly more transfected cells with Nav1.7 staining at the plasma membrane for the WT transfections compared to each of the mutants (* indicates statistically significant result).
Figure 3Electrophysiological characterisation of HEK293 cells transiently transfected with wild-type and mutant SCN9A. (A) Phase contrast, EGFP and DsRed2 fluorescence of HEK293 cells transiently co-transfected with plasmids expressing SCN9A+DsRed2 and SCN1B+SCN2B+EGFP under a CMV promoter. Note that in the phase contrast with the patch pipette one of the fluorescently positive cells is missing as it was used in the previous patch experiment. (B) Current responses to 50 ms voltage steps in 5 mV increments between −110 and +60 mV from a holding potential of −100 mV, in a whole cell voltage clamp recording applied at ∼0.5 Hz for cells co-expressing either WT or mutant Nav1.7 (as indicated) with the β-subunits, identified by their fluorescence as shown in (A). The inset shows the voltage pulse protocol. (C) Current-voltage relationship of peak currents as shown in (B) normalised for cell size (pA/pF). ▪ Nav1.7+Navβ1+Navβ2 (n=5), Nav1.7-ΔR1370-L1374+Navβ1+Navβ2 (n=5), Nav1.7-R896Q+NaVβ1+Navβ2 (n=7), Navβ1+Navβ2 only (n=5). WT data was fitted with a Boltzmann equation y = (A2+(A1-A2)/(1+exp((V0.5-x)/k)(x-Vrev), where V0.5 = −33 mV, k= 2 mV Vrev= 65 mV.