Literature DB >> 20635138

Assessing willingness to pay for cancer prevention.

Michael A Milligan1, Alok K Bohara, José A Pagán.   

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S. and its economic cost is very high. The objective of this study is to analyze the socioeconomic and demographic factors that are related to the willingness to pay (WTP) for cancer prevention. Data from an experimental module in the 2002 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were used to identify WTP differences across different population subgroups. Respondents were asked whether they were willing and able to pay different dollar amounts per month for a new cancer prevention drug. Years of age were negatively related to WTP whereas income and the probability of developing cancer were positively related to WTP. Risk-relevant numeracy skills were positively related to self-assessed cancer risk, which may suggest that adults with poor numeracy skills underestimate their cancer risk. This has consequences not only on the relative perceived value of different cancer treatments across different population subgroups but also on perceived value as captured by WTP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20635138     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-010-9082-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ        ISSN: 1389-6563


  9 in total

Review 1.  The contingent valuation method in health care.

Authors:  T Klose
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  E Frew; J L Wolstenholme; D K Whynes
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Does willingness to pay vary by race/ethnicity? An analysis using mammography among low-income women.

Authors:  T H Wagner; T Hu; G V Dueñas; C P Kaplan; B H Nguyen; R J Pasick
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Exploring preference anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation.

Authors:  Verity Watson; Mandy Ryan
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Judith Hibbard; Paul Slovic; Nathan Dieckmann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  An empiric estimate of the value of life: updating the renal dialysis cost-effectiveness standard.

Authors:  Chris P Lee; Glenn M Chertow; Stefanos A Zenios
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature.

Authors:  A Diener; B O'Brien; A Gafni
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Assessing the value of a new pharmaceutical. A feasibility study of contingent valuation in managed care.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; R Goeree; A Gafni; G W Torrance; M V Pauly; H Erder; J Rusthoven; J Weeks; M Cahill; B LaMont
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  An empirical note on willingness to pay and starting-point bias.

Authors:  N O Stålhammar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Willingness-to-pay to prevent Alzheimer's disease: a contingent valuation approach.

Authors:  Rashmita Basu
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2013-08-31

2.  Perceived risk of exposure to indoor residential radon and its relationship to willingness to test among health care providers in Tehran.

Authors:  Narjes Hazar; Mojgan Karbakhsh; Masud Yunesian; Saharnaz Nedjat; Kazem Naddafi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-08-23

3.  Patients' willingness to pay for their drugs in primary care clinics in an urbanized setting in Malaysia: a guide on drug charges implementation.

Authors:  Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh; Siti Nurul Akma Ahmad; Azimatun Noor Aizuddin; Ramli Zainal; Ruhaini Ismail
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2017-04-04

4.  Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies.

Authors:  Caroline Steigenberger; Magdalena Flatscher-Thoeni; Uwe Siebert; Andrea M Leiter
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 5.  Democracy, Culture and Cancer Patients' Willingness to Pay for Healthcare Services: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mayula Chaikumbung
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Estimating Willingness to Pay for an Improved Service Delivery to Patients Referring Namazi Hospital Chemicalzzm321990Therapy Ward in Iran Using Contingent Valuation

Authors:  Zahra Kavosi; Abdosaleh Jafari; Vida Keshtkaran; Elahe Pourahmadi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-07-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.