Literature DB >> 20634523

Comparison of Cobb and Ross strains in embryo physiology and chick juvenile growth.

K Tona1, O M Onagbesan, B Kamers, N Everaert, V Bruggeman, E Decuypere.   

Abstract

Broiler performance is known to be related to embryonic developmental parameters. However, strain or genotype differences with regard to embryo physiological parameters and juvenile growth have received little attention. A total of 1,200 hatching eggs produced by Cobb and Ross broiler breeders of the same age were studied. At setting for incubation and between 66 and 130 h of incubation, egg resonant frequency (RF) was measured as an indicator of embryonic development. Also, eggs were weighed before setting and at d 18. From d 10 to 18 of incubation, remaining albumen was weighed. During the last days of incubation, hatching events such as internal pipping (IP), external pipping, and hatch were monitored every 2 h. Hatched chicks were recorded and weighed. At IP stage, gas partial pressures in the egg air chamber were measured. Hatched chicks were reared for 7 d and weighed. Results indicate that RF of Ross eggs were lower than those of Cobb eggs (P < 0.01) and starting time point of RF decrease occurred earlier in Cobb eggs than in Ross eggs. Relative egg weight loss up to 18 d of incubation was lower in Cobb than in Ross (P < 0.05). At IP, partial pressure of CO(2) was higher in Cobb than in Ross (P < 0.05) with shorter incubation duration in Cobb. Between 6 and 60 h posthatch, heat production was higher in Cobb than in Ross (P < 0.05). At 7 d posthatch, Cobb chicks were heavier than Ross chicks (P < 0.05). It is concluded that Cobb and Ross embryos-chicks have different growth trajectories leading in different patterns of growth resulting from differences in physiological parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20634523     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

Review 1.  Incubation Temperature and Lighting: Effect on Embryonic Development, Post-Hatch Growth, and Adaptive Response.

Authors:  Servet Yalcin; Sezen Özkan; Tahir Shah
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Effects of heat stress on growth performance, selected physiological and immunological parameters, caecal microflora, and meat quality in two broiler strains.

Authors:  Elmutaz Atta Awad; Muhamad Najaa; Zainool Abidin Zulaikha; Idrus Zulkifli; Abdoreza Farjam Soleimani
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Effect of incubator tray location on broiler chicken growth performance, carcass part yields, and the meat quality defects wooden breast and white striping.

Authors:  O J Tejeda; K J Meloche; J D Starkey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Differential physiological response of slow- and fast-growing broiler lines to hypoxic conditions during chorioallantoic membrane development.

Authors:  R Ben-Gigi; A Haron; D Shinder; M Ruzal; S Druyan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effects of in ovo probiotic administration on the incidence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in broilers and an evaluation on its virulence and antimicrobial resistance properties.

Authors:  Tianmin Li; Claudia D Castañeda; Julio Miotto; Chris McDaniel; Aaron S Kiess; Li Zhang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Omics-Based Analytical Approaches for Assessing Chicken Species and Breeds in Food Authentication.

Authors:  Goh Dirong; Sara Nematbakhsh; Jinap Selamat; Pei Pei Chong; Lokman Hakim Idris; Noordiana Nordin; Fatchiyah Fatchiyah; Ahmad Faizal Abdull Razis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  A meta-analysis of experiments linking incubation conditions with subsequent leg weakness in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Peter J Groves; Wendy I Muir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.