Literature DB >> 20634324

Dialysis facility and patient characteristics associated with utilization of home dialysis.

David R Walker1, Gary W Inglese, James A Sloand, Paul M Just.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nonmedical factors influencing utilization of home dialysis at the facility level are poorly quantified. Home dialysis is comparably effective and safe but less expensive to society and Medicare than in-center hemodialysis. Elimination of modifiable practice variation unrelated to medical factors could contribute to improvements in patient outcomes and use of scarce resources. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Prevalent dialysis patient data by facility were collected from the 2007 ESRD Network's annual reports. Facility characteristic data were collected from Medicare's Dialysis Facility Compare file. A multivariate regression model was used to evaluate associations between the use of home dialysis and facility characteristics.
RESULTS: The utilization of home dialysis was positively associated with facility size, percent patients employed full- or part-time, younger population, and years a facility was Medicare certified. Variables negatively associated include an increased number of hemodialysis patients per hemodialysis station, chain association, rural location, more densely populated zip code, a late dialysis work shift, and greater percent of black patients within a zip code.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved understanding of factors affecting the frequency of use of home dialysis may help explain practice variations across the United States that result in an imbalanced use of medical resources within the ESRD population. In turn, this may improve the delivery of healthcare and extend the ability of an increasingly overburdened medical financing system to survive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20634324      PMCID: PMC2974407          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00080110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  21 in total

1.  US nephrologists' recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey.

Authors:  M Thamer; W Hwang; N E Fink; J H Sadler; S Wills; N W Levin; E B Bass; A S Levey; R Brookmeyer; N R Powe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 2.  Economic evaluations of dialysis treatment modalities.

Authors:  Paul Michael Just; Miguel Carlos Riella; Elizabeth Ann Tschosik; Leslie Lyle Noe; Samir Kumar Bhattacharyya; Frank de Charro
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  ESRD modality selection into the 21st century: the importance of non medical factors.

Authors:  A R Nissenson; S S Prichard; I K Cheng; R Gokal; M Kubota; R Maiorca; M C Riella; J Rottembourg; J H Stewart
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Barriers to utilization of chronic peritoneal dialysis in network #1, New England.

Authors:  Laura Troidle; Alan Kliger; Fredric Finkelstein
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  Home hemodialysis: survival, quality of life, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  E T Oberley; D R Schatell
Journal:  Adv Ren Replace Ther       Date:  1996-04

6.  The financial implications for Medicare of greater use of peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Nancy Neil; Steven Guest; Leslie Wong; Gary Inglese; Samir K Bhattacharyya; Todd Gehr; David R Walker; Thomas Golper
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Ownership patterns of dialysis units and peritoneal dialysis in the United States: utilization and outcomes.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Osman Khawar; Uyen Duong; Linda Fried; Keith Norris; Allen Nissenson; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Why do patients choose self-care dialysis?

Authors:  Kevin McLaughlin; Heather Jones; Carmen VanderStraeten; Cynthia Mills; Marilyn Visser; Ken Taub; Braden Manns
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Dialysis facility characteristics and variation in employment rates: a national study.

Authors:  Nancy Kutner; Tess Bowles; Rebecca Zhang; Yijian Huang; Stephen Pastan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 10.  Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world.

Authors:  Paul M Just; Frank Th de Charro; Elizabeth A Tschosik; Les L Noe; Samir K Bhattacharyya; Miguel C Riella
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  15 in total

1.  Socioeconomic differences in the uptake of home dialysis.

Authors:  Blair S Grace; Philip A Clayton; Nicholas A Gray; Stephen P McDonald
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of and Outcomes with Home Dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Melissa Soohoo; Matthew B Rivara; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Alfred K Cheung; Onyebuchi A Arah; Allen R Nissenson; Vanessa Ravel; Elani Streja; Sooraj Kuttykrishnan; Ronit Katz; Miklos Z Molnar; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Intensive home haemodialysis: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; Christopher T Chan; Simon P Curran
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Racial Differences in Home Dialysis Utilization and Outcomes in Canada.

Authors:  Emilie Trinh; Yingbo Na; Manish M Sood; Christopher T Chan; Jeffrey Perl
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Kenneth Story; Steven Guest; Michelle Fedunyszyn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Rural and micropolitan residence and mortality in patients on dialysis.

Authors:  Saugar Maripuri; Patrick Arbogast; T Alp Ikizler; Kerri L Cavanaugh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Factors Associated With Discontinuation of Home Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Kurnik Seshasai; Nandita Mitra; C Michael Chaknos; Jiaqi Li; Christopher Wirtalla; Dan Negoianu; Joel D Glickman; Laura M Dember
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Assessing the Delivery of Coordinated Care to Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Ontario, Canada: A Survey of Patients and Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Jenna M Evans; Sarah M Wheeler; Saurabh Sati; Sharon Gradin; Marnie MacKinnon; Peter G Blake
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  Trends in home dialysis use differ among age categories in past two decades: A Dutch registry study.

Authors:  Anna A Bonenkamp; Tiny Hoekstra; Marc H Hemmelder; Anita van Eck van der Sluijs; Alferso C Abrahams; Frans J van Ittersum; Brigit C van Jaarsveld
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.