Literature DB >> 20634210

Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized evidence to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation in chronic pelvic pain.

J P Daniels1, L Middleton, T Xiong, R Champaneria, N P Johnson, E M Lichten, C Sutton, P Vercellini, R Gray, R K Hills, K D Jones, G Aimi, K S Khan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting results in randomized trials of the effects of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) in chronic pelvic pain. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis using individual patient data (IPD) to provide the most comprehensive and reliable assessment of the effectiveness of LUNA.
METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in the Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane Library databases from database inception to August 2009. The reference lists of known relevant papers were searched for any further articles. Randomized trials comparing LUNA with no additional intervention were selected and authors contacted for IPD. Raw data were available from 862 women randomized into five trials. Pain scores were calibrated to a 10-point scale and were analysed using a multilevel model allowing for repeated measures.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between LUNA and No LUNA for the worst pain recorded over a 12 month time period (mean difference 0.25 points in favour of No LUNA on a 0-10 point scale, 95% confidence interval: -0.08 to 0.58; P = 0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: LUNA does not result in improved chronic pelvic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20634210     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  5 in total

Review 1.  Endometriosis: where are we and where are we going?

Authors:  Alexis D Greene; Stephanie A Lang; Jessica A Kendziorski; Julie M Sroga-Rios; Thomas J Herzog; Katherine A Burns
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Peripheral changes in endometriosis-associated pain.

Authors:  Matteo Morotti; Katy Vincent; Jennifer Brawn; Krina T Zondervan; Christian M Becker
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 3.  A systematic review of individual patient data meta-analyses on surgical interventions.

Authors:  Gerjon Hannink; Hein G Gooszen; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven; Maroeska M Rovers
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-05

4.  Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study.

Authors:  Claire L Vale; Larysa H M Rydzewska; Maroeska M Rovers; Jonathan R Emberson; François Gueyffier; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-06

5.  Graphical displays for effective reporting of evidence quality tables in research syntheses.

Authors:  Luciano Mignini; Rita Champaneria; Ekaterina Mishanina; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.