Literature DB >> 20633894

The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: evidence from a dual task paradigm.

Jane S M Lidstone1, Elizabeth Meins, Charles Fernyhough.   

Abstract

Children often talk themselves through their activities, producing private speech that is internalized to form inner speech. This study assessed the effect of articulatory suppression (which suppresses private and inner speech) on Tower of London performance in 7- to 10-year-olds, relative to performance in a control condition with a nonverbal secondary task. Experiment 1 showed no effect of articulatory suppression on performance with the standard Tower of London procedure; we interpret this in terms of a lack of planning in our sample. Experiment 2 used a modified procedure in which participants were forced to plan ahead. Performance in the articulatory suppression condition was lower than that in the control condition, consistent with a role for self-directed (private and inner) speech in planning. On problems of intermediate difficulty, participants producing more private speech in the control condition showed greater susceptibility to interference from articulatory suppression than their peers, suggesting that articulatory suppression interfered with performance by blocking self-directed (private and inner) speech. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20633894     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  13 in total

1.  The relationship between parents' and children's automatic thoughts in a college student sample.

Authors:  Reesa Donnelly; Kimberly Renk; Valerie K Sims; Jack McGuire
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2011-04

2.  The Relationship Between Language and Planning in Children With Language Impairment.

Authors:  Caroline Larson; Ishanti Gangopadhyay; Margarita Kaushanskaya; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology.

Authors:  Ben Alderson-Day; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Seeing conflict and engaging control: Experience with contrastive language benefits executive function in preschoolers.

Authors:  Sabine Doebel; Philip David Zelazo
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  Using language to get ready: Familiar labels help children engage proactive control.

Authors:  Sabine Doebel; John P Dickerson; Jerome D Hoover; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  The Effectiveness of Self-regulatory Speech Training for Planning and Problem Solving in Children with Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Safiyyah Abdul Aziz; Janet Fletcher; Donna M Bayliss
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2016-08

7.  Verbal and nonverbal predictors of executive function in early childhood.

Authors:  Rebecca L Stephens; Benjamin Langworthy; Sarah J Short; Barbara D Goldman; Jessica B Girault; Jason P Fine; J Steven Reznick; John H Gilmore
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2018-02-27

8.  Individual differences in children's private speech: the role of imaginary companions.

Authors:  Paige E Davis; Elizabeth Meins; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08-24

9.  Impaired reasoning and problem-solving in individuals with language impairment due to aphasia or language delay.

Authors:  Juliana V Baldo; Selvi R Paulraj; Brian C Curran; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  Individual Differences in Frequency of Inner Speech: Differential Relations with Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors.

Authors:  Xuezhu Ren; Tengfei Wang; Christopher Jarrold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.