| Literature DB >> 20633302 |
M Miriam Jacome-Sosa1, Jing Lu, Ye Wang, Megan R Ruth, David C Wright, Martin J Reaney, Jianheng Shen, Catherine J Field, Donna F Vine, Spencer D Proctor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conjugated linoleic acid (cis-9, trans-11 CLA) and trans-11 vaccenic acid (VA) are found naturally in ruminant-derived foods. CLA has been shown to have numerous potential health related effects and has been extensively investigated. More recently, we have shown that VA has lipid-lowering properties associated with reduced hepatic lipidogenesis and chylomicron secretion in the JCR:LA-cp rat. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential additional hypolipidemic effects of purified forms of CLA and VA in an animal model of the metabolic syndrome (the JCR:LA-cp rat).Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20633302 PMCID: PMC3161353 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Fatty acid composition (% of total fatty acids) of control and experimental diets
| Fatty acid | Control diet (CD) | CLA diet | VA+CLA diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| C16:0 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 9.1 |
| C18:0 | 47.3 | 46.9 | 44.3 |
| 18:1 | ND | ND | 5.6 |
| 18:1 | 17.3 | 11.4 | 10.5 |
| 18:1 | ND | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| C18:2 n6 (LA) | 23.3 | 23.4 | 20.4 |
| C18:3 n3 (ALA) | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| CLA | 0 | 5.2 | 3.9 |
| CLA | ND | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| other CLA | ND | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Summary | |||
| ∑ total SFA2 | 57.2 | 56.3 | 54.2 |
| ∑ C12:0, C14:0, C16:03 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 9.1 |
| ∑ | 17.4 | 12.0 | 11.1 |
| ∑ PUFA5 | 25.0 | 25.1 | 22.0 |
| ∑ n-6 PUFA | 23.4 | 23.4 | 22.0 |
| ∑ n-3 PUFA | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| P/S ratio6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| ∑ CLA | 0.0 | 6.6 | 5.0 |
1. No detectable
2 Sum of all saturated fatty acids
3 Sum of lauric, myristic and palmitic acids
4 cis MUFA, sum of all monounsaturated excepting trans fatty acids
5 Sum of all polyunsaturated fatty acids excepting CLA
6 Ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids
Food intake, body weight and body composition of rats in dietary groups
| Dietary groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food intake (g/day) | 19.7 ± 0.3c | 32.4 ± 0.5b | 31.4 ± 0.6b | 36.1 ± 0.6***a |
| BW/16 wk (g) | 384 ± 8.2c | 646 ± 9.3b | 702 ± 17.9a* | 624 ± 9.5b |
| Heart (g) | 0.89 ± 0.0b | 1.19 ± 0.0a | 1.26 ± 0.0a | 1.23 ± 0.0a |
| weight, %BW | 0.23 ± 0.0a | 0.18 ± 0.0b | 0.18 ± 0.0b | 0.20 ± 0.0b |
| Liver (g) | 9.1 ± 0.4d | 23.1 ± 0.7a | 19.7 ± 0.6***b | 17.2 ± 0.3***c |
| weight, %BW | 2.4 ± 0.1c | 3.6 ± 0.1a | 2.8 ± 0.1***b | 2.8 ± 0.0***b |
| Perirenal FP1 (g) | 1.3 ± 0.1c | 7.4 ± 0.4ab | 8.6 ± 0.8a | 6.7 ± 0.4b |
| weight, %BW | 0.33 ± 0.0b | 1.2 ± 0.1a | 1.2 ± 0.1a | 1.1 ± 0.1a |
| Inguinal FP (g) | 1.4 ± 0.2b | 17.9 ± 1.1a | 18.5 ± 1.0a | 15.7 ± 1.0a |
| weight, %BW | 0.36 ± 0.0b | 2.8 ± 0.2a | 2.6 ± 0.1a | 2.5 ± 0.1a |
Values are means ± SEM, n = 8. Means in the same raw with different symbol are significantly different as compared to obese control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Means in the same raw with different letter are significantly different among control (lean and obese) and obese treated groups (CLA and VA+CLA).
FP1= Fat pad
Figure 1Citrate synthase activity in liver, perirenal and inguinal adipose tissue. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 8. Means with different symbol are significantly different as compared to obese control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Means with different letter are significantly different among control (lean and obese) and obese treated groups (CLA and VA+CLA). AT, adipose tissue.
Fatty acid composition (% of total fatty acids) of triglyceride in epididymal adipose tissue
| Dietary groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid | ||||
| C18:0 | 13.91 ± 0.71a | 6.36 ± 0.14b | 5.47 ± 0.07b | 6.31 ± 0.17b |
| C18:1 | 0.05 ± 0.01b | 0.02 ± 0.00b | 0.08 ± 0.00b | 1.72 ± 0.06***a |
| C18:1 | 28.37 ± 0.14d | 37.9 ± 0.56a | 32.72 ± 0.32***c | 35.21 ± 0.49**b |
| C18:2 n6 | 35.76 ± 0.22a | 20.51 ± 0.24b | 20.15 ± 0.25b | 15.06 ± 0.52***c |
| C18:3 n3 | 1.2 ± 0.03a | 0.91 ± 0.02b | 0.96 ± 0.02b | 0.47 ± 0.06***c |
| CLA | 0.05 ± 0.01c | 0.04 ± 0.01c | 2.85 ± 0.04***a | 1.91 ± 0.09***b |
| C20:4 n6 | 0.45 ± 0.01a | 0.33 ± 0.25b | 0.32 ± 0.01b | 0.22 ± 0.0**c |
Values are mean ± SEM, n = 8. Means in the same raw with different symbol are significantly different as compared to obese control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Means in the same raw with different letter are significantly different among control (lean and obese) and obese treated groups (CLA and VA+CLA). Long chain n3 PUFA were not detectable.
Fasting plasma lipid concentrations, glucose and insulin AUC after MTT and hepatic TG
| Dietary groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.47 ± 0.0c | 3.28 ± 0.4a | 2.05 ± 0.3*b | 1.4 ± 0.1***bc |
| NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.20 ± 0.02c | 0.48 ± 0.02ab | 0.57 ± 0.03a | 0.42 ± 0.05b |
| TC (mmol/L) | 2.26 ± 0.0c | 6.18 ± 0.4a | 4.22 ± 0.2***b | 4.92 ± 0.2**b |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.97 ± 0.1c | 2.28 ± 0.2a | 1.56 ± 0.1**b | 1.2 ± 0.1***bc |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.94 ± 0.08 | 6.81 ± 0.4 | 5.94 ± 0.36 | 6.75 ± 0.72 |
| Glucose iAUC (mmol/L.h) | 45.19 ± 4.5 | 52.22 ± 7.8 | 70.25 ± 14.7 | 42.7 ± 33.05 |
| Fasting insulin (μIU/L) | 73.41 ± 27.4b | 629.2 ± 165.3a | 216 ± 13.6*b | 372.8 ± 98.24ab |
| Insulin AUC (μIU/L.h) | 8739 ± 1566 c | 40437 ± 4384 a | 24548 ± 3465*b | 23001 ± 2744*b |
| Insulin iAUC (μIU/L.h) | 4452 ± 1464 | 11805 ± 7603 | 11585 ± 3885 | 4451 ± 3015 |
| Liver TG (mmol/g protein) | 2.2 ± 0.3d | 21.2 ± 1.0a | 16.6 ± 1.1*b | 12.1 ± 1.3***c |
Plasma lipid and liver TG values are mean ± SEM, n = 8. Insulin AUC is mean ± SEM, n = 4. Means in the same raw with different symbol are significantly different as compared to obese control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Means in the same raw with different letter are significantly different among control (lean and obese) and obese treated groups (CLA and VA+CLA).
Figure 2Post-prandial triglyceride response following an oral fat challenge. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 4. AUC differ relative to obese rats fed the CD; bP < 0.05, cP < 0.001. iAUC differ relative to obese rats fed the CD; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Effects of CLA and VA+CLA on hepatic protein abundance of lipogenic enzymes. Western blots of hepatic lipogenic enzymes (A), and relative abundance of ACC-1 (B) and FAS (C). Values are mean ± SEM, n = 8. Means with different symbol are significantly different as compared to obese rats fed the CD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Means with different letter are significantly different among control (lean and obese) and obese treated groups (CLA and VA+CLA).