Literature DB >> 20632884

Balloon test occlusion with hypotensive challenge for main trunk occlusion of internal carotid artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.

George Kwok Chu Wong1, Wai Sang Poon, Simon Chun Ho Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balloon test occlusion of carotid artery is a useful procedure in managing patients with internal carotid aneurysms and psuedoaneurysms. Previous studies using intravenous sodium nitroprusside for hypotensive challenge yielded false-negative results for haemodynamic ischaemia, highlighting the difference between pharmacological and compensatory vasodilatory responses. We reviewed our management result of a combined approach of clinical assessment and angiographic assessment of venous drainage using intravenous labetalol for hypotensive challenge.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all balloon test occlusions carried in a single neurosurgical institute between August 1996 and August 2009 was carried out. Patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms were reviewed accordingly.
RESULTS: The diagnosis at the time of treatment included radiotherapy-induced internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (11/23, 48%), cavernous internal carotid artery giant aneurysm (6/23, 26%) and ophthalmic segment internal carotid artery giant aneurysm (4/23, 17%). Nineteen (79%) patients passed the balloon test occlusion. In the cohort of patients that passed balloon test occlusion and underwent main trunk occlusion, there were no (0/20, 0%) permanent and no (0, 0%) transient neurological complications related to a subsequent parent artery occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS: A combined approach of clinical assessment and angiographic assessment of venous drainage, using intravenous labetalol for hypotensive challenge, is effective in screening out patients who were at a risk for ischaemia after internal carotid artery occlusion and can serve as a guideline for the selection of patients requiring extracranial-intracranial bypass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632884     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2010.495171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  3 in total

1.  Flow diversion versus traditional endovascular coiling therapy: design of the prospective LARGE aneurysm randomized trial.

Authors:  A S Turk; R H Martin; D Fiorella; J Mocco; A Siddiqui; A Bonafe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Successful Management of a Large Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm via Open Resection.

Authors:  Madeleine de Boer; Timothy P Shiraev; Jacky Loa
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 3.  Intracranial Fusiform and Circumferential Aneurysms of the Main Trunk: Therapeutic Dilemmas and Prospects.

Authors:  Yunbao Guo; Ying Song; Kun Hou; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.