BACKGROUND:Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has recently been reported to be effective in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. However, the clinical utility of TIPS in the subset of refractory ascitic patients with good hepatic and renal function is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of TIPS to that of large-volume paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who have good hepatic and renal function. METHODS:Sixty cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who presented with a Child-Pugh score of <11, serum bilirubin of <3 mg/dl and creatinine of <1.9 mg/dl were assigned randomly to TIPS (n = 30) or large-volume paracentesis plus albumin (n = 30). The primary endpoint was survival. The secondary endpoints were response to treatment and development of hepatic encephalopathy. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Seventeen patients treated with TIPS and 21 treated with paracentesis died during the study period. The cumulative probabilities of survival at 1 and 2 years were 80 and 64% in the TIPS group and 49 and 35% in the paracentesis group (p < 0.005). TIPS was significantly superior to paracentesis in the control of ascites (p < 0.005). Treatment failure was more frequent in the paracentesis group, whereas the frequency of hepatic encephalopathy was greater in the TIPS group. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who have good hepatic and renal function, TIPS improves survival and provides better control of ascites than large-volume paracentesis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has recently been reported to be effective in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. However, the clinical utility of TIPS in the subset of refractory asciticpatients with good hepatic and renal function is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of TIPS to that of large-volume paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who have good hepatic and renal function. METHODS: Sixty cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who presented with a Child-Pugh score of <11, serum bilirubin of <3 mg/dl and creatinine of <1.9 mg/dl were assigned randomly to TIPS (n = 30) or large-volume paracentesis plus albumin (n = 30). The primary endpoint was survival. The secondary endpoints were response to treatment and development of hepatic encephalopathy. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Seventeen patients treated with TIPS and 21 treated with paracentesis died during the study period. The cumulative probabilities of survival at 1 and 2 years were 80 and 64% in the TIPS group and 49 and 35% in the paracentesis group (p < 0.005). TIPS was significantly superior to paracentesis in the control of ascites (p < 0.005). Treatment failure was more frequent in the paracentesis group, whereas the frequency of hepatic encephalopathy was greater in the TIPS group. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who have good hepatic and renal function, TIPS improves survival and provides better control of ascites than large-volume paracentesis.
Authors: J Quiroga; B Sangro; M Núñez; I Bilbao; J Longo; L García-Villarreal; J M Zozaya; M Betés; J I Herrero; J Prieto Journal: Hepatology Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Richard Moreau; Paul Delègue; Fabienne Pessione; Sophie Hillaire; François Durand; Didier Lebrec; Dominique-Charles Valla Journal: Liver Int Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Ahmad Parvinian; James T Bui; M Grace Knuttinen; Jeet Minocha; Ron C Gaba Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Hauke S Heinzow; Philipp Lenz; Michael Köhler; Frank Reinecke; Hansjörg Ullerich; Wolfram Domschke; Dirk Domagk; Tobias Meister Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-10-07 Impact factor: 5.742