Literature DB >> 20632105

Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy is not required for transpapillary SEMS placement for biliary obstruction.

Nikhil Banerjee1, Kristen Hilden, Todd H Baron, Douglas G Adler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary self-expanding metal stent placement is the preferred method of providing biliary drainage for pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Some endoscopists routinely perform biliary sphincterotomy to facilitate biliary stent placement and potentially minimize pancreatitis with transpapillary self-expanding metal stent placement. AIMS: Our hypothesis was that biliary sphincterotomy has no effect on the success rate of transpapillary self-expanding metal stent placement and increases procedure-related complications.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, outcomes of two groups were compared: (1) self-expanding metal stent placement without biliary sphincterotomy, (2) self-expanding metal stent placement with biliary sphincterotomy during the same procedure. Complications and stent patency rates were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were 104 subjects included in the study. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding (p = 0.001) was associated with biliary sphincterotomy performed immediately prior to self-expanding metal stent placement. Importantly, self-expanding metal stent placement without biliary sphincterotomy was always technically successful and self-expanding metal stent placement without biliary sphincterotomy was not associated with pancreatitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo biliary sphincterotomy during transpapillary self-expanding metal stent placement experience more immediate complications than those who do not. Biliary sphincterotomy was not associated with longer stent patency. Self-expanding metal stent placement without a biliary sphincterotomy was not associated with pancreatitis regardless of the type of self-expanding metal stent used (covered or uncovered). Of the patients without a biliary sphincterotomy, 100% had successful stent placement, further arguing against its use in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632105     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1317-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of treatment outcomes between biliary plastic stent placements with and without endoscopic sphincterotomy for inoperable malignant common bile duct obstruction.

Authors:  Pietro Di Giorgio; Leonardo De Luca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  C K Tai; C N Tang; J P Y Ha; C H Chau; W T Siu; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Gallstone disease: Symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Grant R Caddy; Tony C K Tham
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.043

4.  Efficacy and complications of covered Wallstents in malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Michel Kahaleh; Jeffrey Tokar; Mark R Conaway; Andrew Brock; Tri Le; Reid B Adams; Paul Yeaton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Michelle A Anderson; Tamir Ben-Menachem; S Ian Gan; Vasundhara Appalaneni; Subhas Banerjee; Brooks D Cash; Laurel Fisher; M Edwyn Harrison; Robert D Fanelli; Norio Fukami; Steven O Ikenberry; Rajeev Jain; Khalid Khan; Mary Lee Krinsky; David R Lichtenstein; John T Maple; Bo Shen; Laura Strohmeyer; Todd Baron; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Covered Wallstents for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: primary stent placement versus reintervention.

Authors:  Laura C Ornellas; Gerasimos Stefanidis; Ram Chuttani; Andres Gelrud; T Barry Kelleher; Douglas K Pleskow
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: treatment with multipolar electrocoagulation.

Authors:  S Sherman; R H Hawes; R Nisi; G A Lehman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A prospective randomised study of "covered" versus "uncovered" diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  H Isayama; Y Komatsu; T Tsujino; N Sasahira; K Hirano; N Toda; Y Nakai; N Yamamoto; M Tada; H Yoshida; Y Shiratori; T Kawabe; M Omata
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy before deployment of covered metal stent is associated with greater complication rate: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Everson L A Artifon; Paulo Sakai; Shinichi Ishioka; Sérgio B Marques; André S Lino; José E M Cunha; José Jukemura; Ivan Cecconello; Flair J Carrilho; Eduardo Opitz; Atul Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 10.  Palliative biliary stents for obstructing pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A C Moss; E Morris; P Mac Mathuna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19
View more
  18 in total

1.  Risk factors for pancreatitis following transpapillary self-expandable metal stent placement.

Authors:  Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hiroyuki Isayama; Yousuke Nakai; Osamu Togawa; Naoki Sasahira; Hirofumi Kogure; Takashi Sasaki; Saburo Matsubara; Natsuyo Yamamoto; Kenji Hirano; Takeshi Tsujino; Nobuo Toda; Minoru Tada; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quality indicators for ERCP.

Authors:  Douglas G Adler; John G Lieb; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; James M Scheiman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Stuart Sherman; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  How to measure quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  Alexander Krumov Katzarov; Zdravko Ivanov Dunkov; Ivan Popadiin; Krum Sotirov Katzarov
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

4.  Endoscopic biliary stenting and pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ichiro Yasuda
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-04

Review 5.  Endoscopic Palliation of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Vishal B Gohil; Jason B Klapman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  Biliary stenting with or without sphincterotomy for malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Jing Cui; Jing Yao; Yi-Jun Zhao; Hua-Zhong Han; Jun Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jennifer Maranki; Paul Yeaton
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

8.  Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony T DeBenedet; B Joseph Elmunzer; Sean T McCarthy; Grace H Elta; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Biliary sphincterotomy is not required for bile duct stent placement.

Authors:  C Mel Wilcox; Hwasoon Kim; Jayapal Ramesh; Jessica Trevino; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  A Review of Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Shannon J Morales; Kartik Sampath; Timothy B Gardner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.