Literature DB >> 20631627

Relationship between corneal topographic indices and scleral lens base curve.

Muriel M Schornack1, Sanjay V Patel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether parameters of anterior corneal contour as identified by topographic analysis (steep and flat simulated keratometry, reference sphere) predict the base curve of Jupiter scleral lenses in patients with dry eye syndrome and keratoconus.
METHODS: We identified 33 eyes with dry eye syndrome and 21 eyes with keratoconus that were fit with Jupiter scleral lenses of standard design between June 2006 and July 2009. Steep and flat simulated keratometry powers and shape factor from axial topographic maps, reference sphere from elevation maps, and base curve of the scleral lens prescribed for each eye were recorded. Correlations between topographic indices and base curve were evaluated by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and significances were completed by using generalized estimating equation models.
RESULTS: In dry eye syndrome, the base curve of the final scleral lens prescribed correlated with the steep keratometric power (r = 0.70, P = 0.05, n = 33), the flat keratometric power (r = 0.71, P<0.001, n = 33), and the reference sphere (r = 0.73, P = 0.002, n = 33). In eyes with keratoconus, base curve also correlated with the steep keratometric power (r = 0.72, P<0.001, n = 19), the flat keratometric power (r = 0.70, P<0.001, n = 19), and the reference sphere (r = 0.68, P<0.001, n = 21). There were no correlations between base curve and shape factor.
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with normal and abnormal ocular contour, base curve of scleral lenses correlates with reference sphere and steep and flat keratometric powers, but the predictive relationship is weak (r ∼0.50). Diagnostic fitting may be the most efficient method of fitting scleral lenses at present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20631627     DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181eb8418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Keratoconus lenses: the small correction miracle].

Authors:  U Klühspies; A Grunder; S Goebels; F Schirra; B Seitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Complications of Refractive Surgery: Ectasia After Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Meraf A Wolle; J Bradley Randleman; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2016

Review 3.  How Can We Best Measure the Performance of Scleral Lenses? Current Insights.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Daddi Fadel; Melissa Barnett
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Pilot Study for OCT Guided Design and Fit of a Prosthetic Device for Treatment of Corneal Disease.

Authors:  Hong-Gam T Le; Maolong Tang; Ryan Ridges; David Huang; Deborah S Jacobs
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Scleral lens for keratoconus: technology update.

Authors:  Varsha M Rathi; Preeji S Mandathara; Mukesh Taneja; Srikanth Dumpati; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-28

6.  Update on Contact Lens Treatment of Keratoconus

Authors:  Tomris Şengör; Sevda Aydın Kurna
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.