Literature DB >> 20630487

Effect of deviance direction and calculation method on duration and frequency mismatch negativity (MMN).

Varghese Peter1, Genevieve McArthur, William Forde Thompson.   

Abstract

The mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) reflects the process of change detection in the auditory system. The present study investigated the effect of deviance direction (increment vs. decrement) and calculation method (traditional vs. same-stimulus) on the amplitude of MMN. MMN was recorded for increments and decrements in frequency and duration in 20 adults. The stimuli (standard/deviant) were 250 Hz/350 Hz (frequency MMN) and 200 ms/300 ms (duration MMN) for increment MMN and vice versa for decrement MMN. Amplitude of MMN was calculated in two ways: the traditional method (subtracting ERP to the standard from the deviant presented in the same block) and the same-stimulus method (subtracting ERP to identical stimuli presented as standard in one block and deviant in another block). We found that increments in frequency produced higher MMN amplitudes compared to decrements for both methods of calculation. For duration deviance, the decrement MMN was absent in the traditional method, while the decrement and increment MMN did not differ for the same-stimulus method. These findings suggest that the brain processes frequency increments and decrements in different ways. The results also suggest the use of same-stimulus method for the calculation of duration MMN when long duration stimuli are used. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630487     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  24 in total

1.  Native non-prototypicality in vowel perception induces prominent neuromagnetic mismatch intensities in non-native speakers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mikio Kubota; Junko Matsuzaki; Ippeita Dan; Haruka Dan; George Zouridakis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Rhythm judgments reveal a frequency asymmetry in the perception and neural coding of sound synchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Superior time perception for lower musical pitch explains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms.

Authors:  Michael J Hove; Céline Marie; Ian C Bruce; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural correlates of auditory sensory memory dynamics in the aging brain.

Authors:  Sandeepa Sur; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Memory-based mismatch response to frequency changes in rats.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Gabor Stefanics; Miriam Nokia; Arto Lipponen; Fengyu Cong; Markku Penttonen; Timo Ruusuvirta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Preattentive extraction of abstract auditory rules in speech sound stream: a mismatch negativity study using lexical tones.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Wang; Feng Gu; Kang He; Ling-Hui Chen; Lin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Epidural Auditory Event-Related Potentials in the Rat to Frequency and duration Deviants: Evidence of Mismatch Negativity?

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Patricia T Michie; William R Fulham; Juanita Todd; Timothy W Budd; Ulrich Schall; Michael Hunter; Deborah M Hodgson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-09

8.  A sparse neural code for some speech sounds but not for others.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Alexandra Bendixen; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) in freely-moving rats with several experimental controls.

Authors:  Lauren Harms; W Ross Fulham; Juanita Todd; Timothy W Budd; Michael Hunter; Crystal Meehan; Markku Penttonen; Ulrich Schall; Katerina Zavitsanou; Deborah M Hodgson; Patricia T Michie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A neurocomputational model of the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Klaas E Stephan; Jean Daunizeau; Marta I Garrido; Karl J Friston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.