Literature DB >> 20630424

How important are American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination scores when applying for fellowships?

Aaron T Miller1, Gary William Swain, Maria Widmar, Celia M Divino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery In-Training examination (ABSITE) first was administered in 1975 to evaluate a resident's general knowledge as well as the deficiencies within the resident and surgical program. The added importance of this examination in recent years stems from a correlation between ABSITE performance and performance on the American Board of Surgery qualifying examination. However, data are lacking in regard to how fellowship programs view ABSITE scores when considering applicants. Thus, this study was initiated to determine the importance of the ABSITE for surgical residents applying to fellowships. STUDY
DESIGN: Program coordinators and directors of various surgical fellowships were sent a short survey in regard to the ABSITE. The data then were analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight surveys were completed, with 74.8% of the programs ranking the importance of ABSITE scores as 3 or 4 (on a scale of 1 through 5). Most programs (78.9%) reported no minimum percentile requirement. Those that did required a mean percentile of 54.4. Of the programs, 57.8% placed a greater emphasis on the senior examination versus the junior examination (p = 0.06). When compared with other application factors, the ABSITE score ranked 3rd behind letters of recommendation and a candidate's residency program. Colon and rectal surgery placed the highest importance on ABSITE scores, whereas transplant surgery placed the lowest importance.
CONCLUSION: The ABSITE score is an important factor for residents applying to surgical fellowship; however, more weight is given to candidates' letters of recommendation and his or her residency program. Applicants should aim to score above the 50th percentile to be competitive for most fellowship programs. Copyright (c) 2010 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630424     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

1.  Qualities and characteristics of successfully matched North American HPB surgery fellowship candidates.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Jacob E Dowden; Allyson R Cochran; David A Iannitti; Eric T Kimchi; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  General Surgery Resident Use of Electronic Resources: 15 Minutes a Day.

Authors:  Kevin J Hancock; V Suzanne Klimberg; Taylor P Williams; Ravi S Radhakrishnan; Douglas S Tyler; Alexander Perez
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Surgical Jeopardy: Play to Learn.

Authors:  Kevin J Hancock; V Suzanne Klimberg; Taylor P Williams; Douglas S Tyler; Ravi Radhakrishnan; Sifrance Tran
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Evaluation of Factors Associated With Successful Matriculation to Colon and Rectal Surgery Fellowship.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Shindorf; Amy R Copeland; Shreya Gupta; Seth M Steinberg; Scott R Steele; Heather L Yeo; Julian A Sanchez; Jonathan M Hernandez
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.412

5.  Determining the Most Important Factors Involved in Ranking Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.

Authors:  Rishi Baweja; Matthew J Kraeutler; Mary K Mulcahey; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-09

6.  Demonstrating Excellence in Plastic Surgery Residency.

Authors:  Paige N Hackenberger; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.