Literature DB >> 20630291

In vitro osteogenic potential of an experimental calcium silicate-based root canal sealer.

Thomas E Bryan1, Khaled Khechen, Martha G Brackett, Regina L W Messer, Ahmed El-Awady, Carolyn M Primus, James L Gutmann, Franklin R Tay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study compared the cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential of an experimental calcium silicate-based sealer with an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus; Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE) and a zinc oxide-eugenol-based sealer (Pulp Canal Sealer; SybronEndo, Orange, CA).
METHODS: Disks prepared from the respective sealer and from Teflon (negative control) were placed in direct contact with a MC3T3-E1 osteogenic cell line at 6 weekly intervals after immersion in a culture medium. Succinic dehydrogenase activities were evaluated using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Extracts from these sealers after the 6-week immersion period were investigated also by MTT assay. Aged sealers were then switched to an osteogenic medium for examination of the alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization of extracellular matrices produced by the differentiated cells.
RESULTS: All sealers exhibited severe toxicity after 24 hours, after which toxicity decreased gradually over the experimental period except for Pulp Canal Sealer, which remained severely toxic. Toxicity of the extracts derived from the sealers was concentration dependent, with those derived from the experimental sealer being the least cytotoxic at a 1:10 dilution. Minimal alkaline phosphatase activity and no bone formation were seen with Pulp Canal Sealer. The production of alkaline phosphatase was less intense for the experimental sealer at 7 days. However, both AH Plus and the experimental sealer did not inhibit mineralization of the extracellular matrix after 28 days.
CONCLUSION: The experimental calcium silicate-based sealer may be regarded as minimally tissue irritating and does not interfere with bone regeneration even when it is inadvertently extruded through the apical constriction. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630291     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  11 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of bioceramic sealer iRoot SP extrusion in root canal treatment: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jing Li; Liuchi Chen; Chunmei Zeng; Yiwen Liu; Qimei Gong; Hongwei Jiang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.246

2.  In vitro biocompatibility and oxidative stress profiles of different hydraulic calcium silicate cements.

Authors:  Ashraf A Eid; Johnny L Gosier; Carolyn M Primus; Barry D Hammond; Lisiane F Susin; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Behaviour of co-cultured human osteoclastic and osteoblastic cells exposed to endodontic sealers' extracts.

Authors:  Cláudia Rodrigues; João Costa-Rodrigues; José A Capelas; Maria H Fernandes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effects of tricalcium silicate cements on osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  Ashraf A Eid; Khaled A Hussein; Li-na Niu; Guo-hua Li; Ikuya Watanabe; Mohamed Al-Shabrawey; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential of silicate calcium cements as potential protective materials for pulpal revascularization.

Authors:  Eduardo A Bortoluzzi; Li-Na Niu; Chithra D Palani; Ahmed R El-Awady; Barry D Hammond; Dan-Dan Pei; Fu-Cong Tian; Christopher W Cutler; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 6.  Biotoxicity of commonly used root canal sealers: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amandeep Kaur; Naseem Shah; Ajay Logani; Navin Mishra
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review.

Authors:  Afaf Al-Haddad; Zeti A Che Ab Aziz
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 8.  Biocompatibility of Root Canal Sealers: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Diogo Afonso Fonseca; Anabela Baptista Paula; Carlos Miguel Marto; Ana Coelho; Siri Paulo; José Pedro Martinho; Eunice Carrilho; Manuel Marques Ferreira
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Effects of a discoloration-resistant calcium aluminosilicate cement on the viability and proliferation of undifferentiated human dental pulp stem cells.

Authors:  Li-na Niu; Devon Watson; Kyle Thames; Carolyn M Primus; Brian E Bergeron; Kai Jiao; Eduardo A Bortoluzzi; Christopher W Cutler; Ji-hua Chen; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cytotoxic evaluation of a new ceramic-based root canal sealer on human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sandra Chakar; Sylvie Changotade; Nada Osta; Issam Khalil
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.