Literature DB >> 20630179

Comprehensive comparison of liquid chromatography selectivity as provided by two types of liquid chromatography detectors (high resolution mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry): "where is the crossover point?".

A Kaufmann1, P Butcher, K Maden, S Walker, M Widmer.   

Abstract

The selectivity of mass traces obtained by monitoring liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was compared. A number of blank extracts (fish, pork kidney, pork liver and honey) were separated by ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). Detected were some 100 dummy transitions respectively dummy exact masses (traces). These dummy masses were the product of a random generator. The range of the permitted masses corresponded to those which are typical for analytes (e.g. veterinary drugs). The large number of monitored dummy traces ensured that endogenous compounds present in the matrix extract, produced a significant number of detectable chromatographic peaks. All obtained chromatographic peaks were integrated and standardized. Standardisation was done by dividing these absolute peak areas by the average response of a set of 7 different veterinary drugs. This permitted a direct comparison between the LC-HRMS and LC-MS/MS data. The data indicated that the selectivity of LC-HRMS exceeds LC-MS/MS, if high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data is recorded with a resolution of 50,000 full width at half maximum (FWHM) and a corresponding mass window. This conclusion was further supported by experimental data (MS/MS based trace analysis), where a false positive finding was observed. An endogenous matrix compound present in honey matrix behaved like a banned nitroimidazole drug. This included identical retention time and two MRM traces, producing an MRM ratio between them, which perfectly matched the ratio observed in the external standard. HRMS measurement clearly resolved the interfering matrix compound and unmasked the false positive MS/MS finding. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630179     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  14 in total

1.  The chromatographic role in high resolution mass spectrometry for non-targeted analysis.

Authors:  Timothy R Croley; Kevin D White; John H Callahan; Steven M Musser
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Analytical improvements of hybrid LC-MS/MS techniques for the efficient evaluation of emerging contaminants in river waters: a case study of the Henares River (Madrid, Spain).

Authors:  Andrés Pérez-Parada; María del Mar Gómez-Ramos; María Jesús Martínez Bueno; Samanta Uclés; Ana Uclés; Amadeo R Fernández-Alba
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  New trends in the analytical determination of emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters.

Authors:  Ana Agüera; María Jesús Martínez Bueno; Amadeo R Fernández-Alba
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  High-Resolution Metabolomics: Review of the Field and Implications for Nursing Science and the Study of Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Shuzhao Li; Anne L Dunlop; Dean P Jones; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.522

5.  Characterization of endocrine disruptors from a complex matrix using estrogen receptor affinity columns and high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Adeline Jondeau-Cabaton; Amélie Soucasse; Emilien L Jamin; Nicolas Creusot; Marina Grimaldi; Isabelle Jouanin; Sélim Aït-Aïssa; Patrick Balaguer; Laurent Debrauwer; Daniel Zalko
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Highly sensitive and selective determination of redox states of coenzymes Q9 and Q10 in mice tissues: Application of orbitrap mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Renu Pandey; Christopher L Riley; Edward M Mills; Stefano Tiziani
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 7.  Recent Advances and Future Challenges in Modified Mycotoxin Analysis: Why HRMS Has Become a Key Instrument in Food Contaminant Research.

Authors:  Laura Righetti; Giuseppe Paglia; Gianni Galaverna; Chiara Dall'Asta
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Multiresidue Method for the Rapid Determination of Pesticide Residues in Tea Using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Orbitrap High Resolution Mass Spectrometry and In-Syringe Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction.

Authors:  Hongping Chen; Guanwei Gao; Yunfeng Chai; Guicen Ma; Zhenxia Hao; Chen Wang; Xin Liu; Chengyin Lu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 9.  Blood transcriptomics and metabolomics for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Shuzhao Li; Andrei Todor; Ruiyan Luo
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 10.  Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater.

Authors:  Félix Hernández; Sara Castiglioni; Adrian Covaci; Pim de Voogt; Erik Emke; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Christoph Ort; Malcolm Reid; Juan V Sancho; Kevin V Thomas; Alexander L N van Nuijs; Ettore Zuccato; Lubertus Bijlsma
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 10.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.