Literature DB >> 20629571

Renal hilar control during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: to clamp or not to clamp.

Hyun Jung Koo1, Dong Hyeon Lee, Isaac Yi Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To decrease intraoperative and perioperative morbidity that is associated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), clamping of the renal hilum has been advocated. It has been suggested, however, that renal hilar control is not necessary in all patients. We compared the perioperative and pathologic results of 21 consecutive patients who underwent LPN with or without renal hilar clamping at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent LPN over a 24-month period. Of these, 11 LPNs were completed without hilar control while 10 needed hilar clamping. Renal hilar control was deemed necessary if the depth of tumor invasion was greater than 50% of the renal parenchyma on CT or MRI. Only the artery was clamped. We retrospectively analyzed the intraoperative, perioperative, and the pathologic results.
RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 2.6 cm (range 0.8-4.2 cm) in the nonclamped group and 2.3 cm (range 1.5-3 cm) in the clamped group. The mean operative time was 174 minutes (range 95-270 min) in the nonclamped group and 232 minutes (range 180-270 min) in the clamped group. The mean ischemia time was 29 minutes (range 21-45 min) in the clamped group. The mean postoperative serum creatinine level was 1.1 mg/dL (range 0.7-2.0 mg/dL) in the nonclamped and 1.1mg/dL (range 0.7-1.8 mg/dL) in the clamped group. Postoperative transfusion was not needed. In one patient in the nonclamped group and in three patients in the clamped group, urine leak occurred. In the nonclamped group, 7 of the 11 procedures were for benign tumors while only 2 of the 10 lesions in the clamped group were benign.
CONCLUSIONS: LPN can be performed safely in selected patients without clamping the hilum. Tumors that need cross-clamping of the renal hilum were more likely to be malignant. We suggest that the decision to clamp the hilar vessels should be made based on each patient's characteristics and radiologic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20629571     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Zero ischemia robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in Alberta: Initial results of a novel approach.

Authors:  Ellen Forbes; Douglas Cheung; Adam Kinnaird; Blair St Martin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Greco; Riccardo Autorino; Vincenzo Altieri; Steven Campbell; Vincenzo Ficarra; Inderbir Gill; Alexander Kutikov; Alex Mottrie; Vincenzo Mirone; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 24.267

3.  Off-clamp partial nephrectomy has a positive impact on short- and long-term renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Xiaoqiang Liu; Jieping Hu; Luyao Chen; Bin Fu
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Comparison of Renal Function between Robot-Assisted and Open Partial Nephrectomy as Determined by Tc 99m-DTPA Renal Scintigraphy.

Authors:  Chanwoo Lee; Taekmin Kwon; Sangjun Yoo; Jaeyoon Jung; Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Effectiveness and safety of partial nephrectomy-no ischemia vs. warm ischemia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Hernando Mina-Riascos; Gonzalo Vitagliano; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.