Literature DB >> 20629031

Critical role of surgery in patients with gastroesophageal carcinoma with a poor prognosis after chemoradiation as defined by positron emission tomography.

Srikrishna V Patnana1, Santosh B Murthy, Lianchun Xiao, Eric Rohren, Wayne L Hofstetter, Stephen G Swisher, Zhongxing Liao, Jeffrey H Lee, Manoop S Bhutani, Homer A Macapinlac, Xuemei Wang, Jaffer A Ajani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with localized gastroesophageal carcinoma (LGC) can be defined after chemoradiation by the standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET). High SUV (HSUV) after chemoradiation portends a poor prognosis. The authors retrospectively examined the role of surgery in patients with HSUV after chemoradiation.
METHODS: The authors analyzed the postchemoradiation PET scans of 204 LGC patients. One hundred twenty-nine patients had HSUV. Two postchemoradiation variables were evaluated: SUV and surgery and their association with overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). The log-rank test, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, and Kaplan-Meier survival plots were used to assess the association between OS or EFS and the dichotomized SUV (using the median SUV as the cutoff) and surgery.
RESULTS: The median SUV was 4.6. The OS of the 52 patients who had an SUV above the median and did not undergo surgery (HSUV-NS) (median OS, 1.22 years; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-2.16 years) was much shorter than that of the 77 patients with an SUV above the median who underwent surgery (HSUV-S) (median OS, 2.7 years; 95% CI, 2.43 years to not reached [P<.0001]). Similarly, the EFS for patients with HSUV-NS was significantly shorter than that for patients with HSUV-S (P=.001). In the multivariate analyses, patients who underwent surgery (irrespective of SUV) had a lower risk of death (P=.0001) and disease progression (P=.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study suggest that surgery may prolong OS and EFS in patients with a poor prognosis after chemoradiation as defined by PET. However, these data need confirmation.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20629031     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification.

Authors:  Pascaline Schollaert; Ralph Crott; Claude Bertrand; Lionel D'Hondt; Thierry Vander Borght; Bruno Krug
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Initial Standardized Uptake Value of Positron Emission Tomography Influences the Prognosis of Patients with Localized Gastric Adenocarcinoma Treated Preoperatively.

Authors:  Nikolaos Charalampakis; Lianchun Xiao; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Mariela A Blum; Venkatram Planjery; Jane E Rogers; Aurelio Matamoros; Tara Sagebiel; Prajnan Das; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Brian D Badgwell; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.935

3.  Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Akihiro Suzuki; Lianchun Xiao; Yuki Hayashi; Homer A Macapinlac; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with localised oesophagogastric junction cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiation:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  W Zhu; L Xing; J Yue; X Sun; X Sun; H Zhao; J Yu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Surgery is an essential component of multimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Arlene M Correa; Jaffer A Ajani; Ritsuko U Komaki; James W Welsh; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Post-chemoradiotherapy FDG PET with qualitative interpretation criteria for outcome stratification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yung-Cheng Huang; Shau-Hsuan Li; Hung-I Lu; Chien-Chin Hsu; Yu-Ming Wang; Wei-Che Lin; Chao-Jung Chen; Kuo-Wei Ho; Nan-Tsing Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.