Literature DB >> 20628774

FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples.

Reinhard Hickel1, Arnd Peschke, Martin Tyas, Ivar Mjör, Stephen Bayne, Mathilde Peters, Karl-Anton Hiller, Ross Randall, Guido Vanherle, Siegward D Heintze.   

Abstract

In 2007, new clinical criteria were approved by the FDI World Dental Federation and simultaneously published in three dental journals. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic parameters (four criteria), functional parameters (six criteria) and biological parameters (six criteria). Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The criteria have been used in several clinical studies since 2007, and the resulting experience in their application has led to a requirement to modify some of the criteria and scores. The two major alterations involve staining and approximal contacts. As staining of the margins and the surface has different causes, both phenomena do not appear simultaneously. Thus, staining has been differentiated into marginal staining and surface staining. The approximal contact now appears under the name "approximal anatomic form" as the approximal contour is a specific, often non-esthetic issue that cannot be integrated into the criterion "esthetic anatomical form". In 2008, a web-based training and calibration tool called e-calib ( www.e-calib.info ) was made available. Clinical investigators and other research workers can train and calibrate themselves interactively by assessing clinical cases of posterior restorations which are presented as high-quality pictures. Currently, about 300 clinical cases are included in the database which is regularly updated. Training for eight of the 16 clinical criteria is available in the program: "Surface lustre"; "Staining (surface, margins)"; "Color match and translucency"; Esthetic anatomical form"; "Fracture of material and retention"; "Marginal adaptation"; "Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction"; and "Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)". Typical clinical cases are presented for each of these eight criteria and their corresponding five scores.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628774     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  R Hickel; J-F Roulet; S Bayne; S D Heintze; I A Mjör; M Peters; V Rousson; R Randall; G Schmalz; M Tyas; G Vanherle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  R Hickel; J F Roulet; S Bayne; S D Heintze; I A Mjör; M Peters; V Rousson; R Randall; G Schmalz; M Tyas; G Vanherle
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98--FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns.

Authors:  Reinhard Hickel; Jean-François Roulet; Stephen Bayne; Siegward D Heintze; Ivar A Mjör; Mathilde Peters; Valentin Rousson; Ros Randall; Gottfried Schmalz; Martin Tyas; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 4.  Methods of clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  P J Knibbs
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.837

  4 in total
  42 in total

1.  Need of non-operative caries treatment in 16-year-olds from Northern Norway.

Authors:  I D Jacobsen; C-G Crossner; H M Eriksen; I Espelid; C Ullbro
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-12-04

2.  Five-year evaluation of a low-shrinkage Silorane resin composite material: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Malene Schmidt; Irene Dige; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang; Michael Vaeth; Preben Hørsted-Bindslev
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Twenty-nine-month follow-up of a paediatric zirconia dental crown.

Authors:  Serena Lopez Cazaux; Isabelle Hyon; Tony Prud'homme; Sylvie Dajean Trutaud
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  Randomized controlled clinical trial of a highly filled flowable composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 3-year results.

Authors:  Haiying Zhang; Luxuan Wang; Lin Hua; Rui Guan; Benxiang Hou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Márcia de Almeida Durão; Ana Karina Maciel de Andrade; Amanda Maciel do Prado; Sirley Raiane Mamede Veloso; Lynn Morena Tavares Maciel; Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende Montes; Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  A randomized clinical trial of class II composite restorations using direct and semidirect techniques.

Authors:  Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Mariane Cintra Mailart; Érica Crastechini; Fernanda Alves Feitosa; Stella Renato Machado Esteves; Rebeca Di Nicoló; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months.

Authors:  Vanessa Vogl; Karl-Anton Hiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Marianne Federlin; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Uzay Koc Vural; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Maren Teichmann; Anna Lena Wienert; Marcia Rückbeil; Volker Weber; Stefan Wolfart; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.