Literature DB >> 20628712

[Intraosseous access for in-hospital emergencies. Intensive medical care case study].

M Werner1, H-P Daniel, J Hoitz.   

Abstract

Since the release of the 2005 resuscitation guidelines intraosseous infusion has been recognized as the favorite alternative vascular access in emergency patients. It is no longer restricted to paediatric emergencies but is also considered the vascular access of choice for adult patients with difficult venous access. Intraosseous access has been used in an increasing proportion of patients especially in an out-of-hospital emergency care setting while only limited experience exists for in-hospital usage of this technique. This article reports on a case of intraosseous access performed in a critically ill patient directly after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to difficult peripheral venous access. Despite the extensive medical resources available in the ICU (i.e. central venous catheterization) less invasive means were used to render appropriate care. Based on this case different strategies of critical care and possible improvements will be discussed. Intraosseous infusion should be regarded as an infrequently needed but potentially life-saving procedure that is still too often considered as an option at later stages during in-hospital emergency care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628712     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-010-1720-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  15 in total

Review 1.  Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review.

Authors:  Sibylle Ruesch; Bernhard Walder; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Mechanical complications of central venous catheters.

Authors:  Lewis A Eisen; Mangala Narasimhan; Jeffrey S Berger; Paul H Mayo; Mark J Rosen; Roslyn F Schneider
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.510

3.  Consecutive field trials using two different intraosseous devices.

Authors:  Ralph J Frascone; Joe P Jensen; Kory Kaye; Joshua G Salzman
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Intraosseous infusion: an alternative route of pediatric intravascular access.

Authors:  V A Rosetti; B M Thompson; J Miller; J R Mateer; C Aprahamian
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO.

Authors:  Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Yiong Huak Chan; Jen Jen Oh; Adeline Su-Yin Ngo
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Comparison of two intraosseous infusion systems for adult emergency medical use.

Authors:  Thorsten Brenner; Michael Bernhard; Matthias Helm; Sara Doll; Alfred Völkl; Nicole Ganion; Claudia Friedmann; Marcus Sikinger; Jürgen Knapp; Eike Martin; André Gries
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Intra-osseous access (EZ-IO) for resuscitation: UK military combat experience.

Authors:  B R Cooper; P F Mahoney; T J Hodgetts; A Mellor
Journal:  J R Army Med Corps       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 8.  Intraosseous infusions: a review for the anesthesiologist with a focus on pediatric use.

Authors:  Joseph D Tobias; Allison Kinder Ross
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Proximal humerus intraosseous infusion: a preferred emergency venous access.

Authors:  James H Paxton; Thomas E Knuth; Howard A Klausner
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-09

Review 10.  [Intraosseous infusion. An important technique also for paediatric anaesthesia].

Authors:  M Weiss; G Henze; C Eich; D Neuhaus
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.