Literature DB >> 20628333

Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography to measure lumbar back muscle activity.

Nele Dickx1, Roseline D'Hooge, Barbara Cagnie, Ellen Deschepper, Koenraad Verstraete, Lieven Danneels.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Mixed model analysis of muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electromyography (EMG) changes in lumbar muscles during trunk extension exercise at varying intensities.
OBJECTIVE: To gain insight within the relationship between muscle functional MRI and activity of the lumbar back muscles, which is related to exercise intensity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It is known that muscle activity during exercise induces a force-sensitive T2 increase; however, it is not known how sensitive this T2 change is. In addition, the association between MRI and EMG measurement was investigated.
METHODS: Multifidus and erector spinae muscle activity was investigated during a trunk extension exercise at 5 increasing loads (from 40% to 80% of 1 repetition maximum), with both MRI and EMG. Data were analyzed using mixed model analysis.
RESULTS: Our results indicate a linear relationship between MRI and exercise intensity; for both muscles an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of the T2 value with 1.18 (0.89, 1.47) ms. Also for EMG there is a linear relationship with exercise intensity; an increase of 10% exercise intensity corresponds with an increase of 6.98 (5.33, 8.62) microV. Furthermore, a linear association between MRI and EMG is acceptable. For the multifidus, an increase of 1 muV (EMG) corresponds with an increase of 0.168 (0.117, 0.219) ms (MRI). For the erector spinae, an increase of 1 microV corresponds with an increase of 0.078 (0.042, 0.114) ms.
CONCLUSION: Both muscle functional MRI and EMG have specific (dis-) advantages and therefore have to be seen as complementary techniques. Nevertheless, our results support the validity of each method and indicate that MRI and EMG can be used independently to quantify lumbar muscle activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628333     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d79f02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Posterior muscle chain activity during various extension exercises: an observational study.

Authors:  Eline Md De Ridder; Jessica O Van Oosterwijck; Andry Vleeming; Guy G Vanderstraeten; Lieven A Danneels
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Relationship of moderate and low isometric lumbar extension through architectural and muscular activity variables: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 3.  Muscular changes after minimally invasive versus open spinal stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: A literature review.

Authors:  Miguel Pishnamaz; Ulrike Schemmann; Christian Herren; Klemens Horst; Philipp Lichte; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape; Philipp Kobbe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 4.  Inconsistent descriptions of lumbar multifidus morphology: A scoping review.

Authors:  Anke Hofste; Remko Soer; Hermie J Hermens; Heiko Wagner; Frits G J Oosterveld; André P Wolff; Gerbrand J Groen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Towards a Simplified Estimation of Muscle Activation Pattern from MRI and EMG Using Electrical Network and Graph Theory.

Authors:  Enrico Piovanelli; Davide Piovesan; Shouhei Shirafuji; Becky Su; Natsue Yoshimura; Yousuke Ogata; Jun Ota
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.